Starting this topic to discuss how to divide up work.
For now we agreed to open issues for each resource type, and meta issues grouping the resource issues for larger things like compute.
cc @Sean Isom @Atanas Atanasov
I'm good to take on some of the deeper rendering topics
i can take a look on compute pass topics
I've added all issue for each resource at https://github.com/MendyBerger/wasi-webgpu/issues.
@Sean Isom @Atanas Atanasov do you mind creating issues for your respective topics?
@Mendy Berger I noticed you made one issue ("Open question: How to deal with buffers that need lots of reads/writes") in the repo in the WebAssebly org and the rest of the issues in your repo. Is that intentional?
Yes.
Spec issues should be on the WebAssembly repo, and example issues should be the examples repo.
I'll move over the wit to the WebAssembly repo as well.
Makes sense?
BTW do you think that we should create an org for all our repositories, instead of having these repos under personal names?
I think it's fine for now, we could make milestones an merge them into the official WebAssembly repo. So what do you think, should the Windowing proposal stay separate or also be included in your one? In case it's included, I'd likely change mini-canvas
and name it more appropriately.
Yeah, naming is hard, I didn't put much effort in naming things well. Feel free to suggest better names in the naming topic
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC