fitzgen (he/him) (Mar 09 2021 at 17:58): fitzgen (he/him) (Mar 09 2021 at 17:58):just read the meeting notes, the benchmarks that are mentioned, can they become part of our canonical sightglass benchmark suite?
Till Schneidereit (Mar 09 2021 at 20:05):I think that'd be great, yes! @Shravan Narayan, do you think that'd be possible?
Shravan Narayan (Mar 09 2021 at 20:08):Yup, the jpeg benchmark can be added without too much difficulty. It pulls in libjpeg though; not sure if that's a blocker somehow.
Shravan Narayan (Mar 09 2021 at 20:08):(i.e. a blocker in terms of what people want to have in the sightglass repo)
fitzgen (he/him) (Mar 09 2021 at 20:55):as long as it is freely distributable, so it doesn't mess up our ability to share the benchmark corpus, we have no problems!
Shravan Narayan (Mar 10 2021 at 21:25):Sounds good. I'll try to put together a cleaned up version of this benchmark later this week, so folks can have a look :+1:
Shravan Narayan (Mar 10 2021 at 21:26):Separately, will also try to locate my early numbers for lucet vs wasmtime
Alex Crichton (Mar 10 2021 at 21:40):It's ok if you can't find the lucet numbers btw, if the target is %-slower than native that's easy enough to benchmark against
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC