Stream: lucet-wasmtime-migration

Topic: benchmarks


view this post on Zulip fitzgen (he/him) (Mar 09 2021 at 17:58):

just read the meeting notes, the benchmarks that are mentioned, can they become part of our canonical sightglass benchmark suite?

RFC process for Bytecode Alliance projects. Contribute to bytecodealliance/rfcs development by creating an account on GitHub.
A benchmark suite and tool to compare different implementations of the same primitives. - bytecodealliance/sightglass

view this post on Zulip Till Schneidereit (Mar 09 2021 at 20:05):

I think that'd be great, yes! @Shravan Narayan, do you think that'd be possible?

view this post on Zulip Shravan Narayan (Mar 09 2021 at 20:08):

Yup, the jpeg benchmark can be added without too much difficulty. It pulls in libjpeg though; not sure if that's a blocker somehow.

view this post on Zulip Shravan Narayan (Mar 09 2021 at 20:08):

(i.e. a blocker in terms of what people want to have in the sightglass repo)

view this post on Zulip fitzgen (he/him) (Mar 09 2021 at 20:55):

as long as it is freely distributable, so it doesn't mess up our ability to share the benchmark corpus, we have no problems!

view this post on Zulip Shravan Narayan (Mar 10 2021 at 21:25):

Sounds good. I'll try to put together a cleaned up version of this benchmark later this week, so folks can have a look :+1:

view this post on Zulip Shravan Narayan (Mar 10 2021 at 21:26):

Separately, will also try to locate my early numbers for lucet vs wasmtime

view this post on Zulip Alex Crichton (Mar 10 2021 at 21:40):

It's ok if you can't find the lucet numbers btw, if the target is %-slower than native that's easy enough to benchmark against


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 14:03 UTC