tschneidereit submitted PR Review.
tschneidereit created PR Review Comment:
The intent was to have risk assessment be covered by this section, but I agree that it's a bit implicit. I see you've signed off by now (thank you!), but do you think it'd be strongly preferable to address this now? To me it seems like we can include this in a future revision after we learn a bit more about the process in practice.
yurydelendik submitted PR Review.
yurydelendik created PR Review Comment:
Is it expected for this process to deviate from Rust's one? In case of if either process changes, the statements "like Rust's" or "similarly to the one in Rust" might become incorrect. Is it possible to point this proposal to specific version of Rust's RFC process?
ggreif submitted PR Review.
ggreif created PR Review Comment:
No need to get into it right now. Let's wait for a fine-tuning revision, and get some phrasing in then.
tschneidereit submitted PR Review.
tschneidereit created PR Review Comment:
I filed #7 to track this.
tschneidereit submitted PR Review.
tschneidereit created PR Review Comment:
Good point that those processes might change, and that these references might become stale as a result. I think that that's fine though, since over time it'll also become less important to be able to anchor expectations to related processes in other communities. But we could certainly include more stable links here; would you be up for looking them up, @yurydelendik?
akirilov-arm submitted PR Review.
tschneidereit merged PR #1.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC