cfallin commented on Issue #3:
I've gone ahead and updated this RFC based on the (detailed and very useful!) discussion above; sorry for the delay and thanks everyone! I'm hoping to push this forward in the process some more, as we have benchmarking hosts now and @abrown, @jlb6740 and @fitzgen have been working on benchmarking.
cfallin commented on Issue #3:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
Given that discussion here has quiesced and the benchmarking work is well underway (and the sibling RFC #4 that describes the benchmark suite infra has merged), I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
I believe that all feedback has been merged into the updated RFC.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime or Lucet repos in the last three months<sup>1</sup>, plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [ ] @alexcrichton
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @jedisct1
- [ ] @fitzgen
- [ ] @pchickey
- [ ] @peterhuene
- [ ] @acfoltzer
- [ ] @iximeow
Intel
- [ ] @abrown
- [ ] @jlb6740
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
<small><sup>1</sup>: Cheatsheet for my own later reference:
git log --since=$(date +%Y-%m-%d --date='3 months ago') | grep ^Author: | sort | uniq
</small>
fitzgen edited a comment on Issue #3:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
Given that discussion here has quiesced and the benchmarking work is well underway (and the sibling RFC #4 that describes the benchmark suite infra has merged), I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
I believe that all feedback has been merged into the updated RFC.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime or Lucet repos in the last three months<sup>1</sup>, plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [ ] @alexcrichton
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @jedisct1
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @pchickey
- [ ] @peterhuene
- [ ] @acfoltzer
- [ ] @iximeow
Intel
- [ ] @abrown
- [ ] @jlb6740
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
<small><sup>1</sup>: Cheatsheet for my own later reference:
git log --since=$(date +%Y-%m-%d --date='3 months ago') | grep ^Author: | sort | uniq
</small>
cfallin edited a comment on Issue #3:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
Given that discussion here has quiesced and the benchmarking work is well underway (and the sibling RFC #4 that describes the benchmark suite infra has merged), I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
I believe that all feedback has been merged into the updated RFC.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime or Lucet repos in the last three months<sup>1</sup>, plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [ ] @alexcrichton
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @jedisct1
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @pchickey
- [ ] @peterhuene
- [ ] @acfoltzer
- [ ] @iximeow
Intel
- [x] @abrown
- [ ] @jlb6740
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
<small><sup>1</sup>: Cheatsheet for my own later reference:
git log --since=$(date +%Y-%m-%d --date='3 months ago') | grep ^Author: | sort | uniq
</small>
cfallin commented on Issue #3:
Entering Final Call Period
Once any stakeholder from a different group has signed off, the RFC will move into a 10 calendar day final comment period (FCP), long enough to ensure that other stakeholders have at least a full business week to respond.
The FCP will end on February 26th.
cfallin edited a comment on Issue #3:
Entering Final Call Period
Once any stakeholder from a different group has signed off, the RFC will move into a 10 calendar day final comment period (FCP), long enough to ensure that other stakeholders have at least a full business week to respond.
The FCP will end on Mon Mar 8.
cfallin commented on Issue #3:
(Sorry, copy/paste error with FCP end date; fixed to Mar 8.)
alexcrichton edited a comment on Issue #3:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
Given that discussion here has quiesced and the benchmarking work is well underway (and the sibling RFC #4 that describes the benchmark suite infra has merged), I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
I believe that all feedback has been merged into the updated RFC.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime or Lucet repos in the last three months<sup>1</sup>, plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @jedisct1
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @pchickey
- [ ] @peterhuene
- [ ] @acfoltzer
- [ ] @iximeow
Intel
- [x] @abrown
- [ ] @jlb6740
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
<small><sup>1</sup>: Cheatsheet for my own later reference:
git log --since=$(date +%Y-%m-%d --date='3 months ago') | grep ^Author: | sort | uniq
</small>
peterhuene edited a comment on Issue #3:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
Given that discussion here has quiesced and the benchmarking work is well underway (and the sibling RFC #4 that describes the benchmark suite infra has merged), I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
I believe that all feedback has been merged into the updated RFC.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime or Lucet repos in the last three months<sup>1</sup>, plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @jedisct1
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @pchickey
- [x] @peterhuene
- [ ] @acfoltzer
- [ ] @iximeow
Intel
- [x] @abrown
- [ ] @jlb6740
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
<small><sup>1</sup>: Cheatsheet for my own later reference:
git log --since=$(date +%Y-%m-%d --date='3 months ago') | grep ^Author: | sort | uniq
</small>
cfallin edited a comment on Issue #3:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
Given that discussion here has quiesced and the benchmarking work is well underway (and the sibling RFC #4 that describes the benchmark suite infra has merged), I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
I believe that all feedback has been merged into the updated RFC.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime or Lucet repos in the last three months<sup>1</sup>, plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [x] @jedisct1
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @pchickey
- [x] @peterhuene
- [ ] @acfoltzer
- [ ] @iximeow
Intel
- [x] @abrown
- [ ] @jlb6740
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
<small><sup>1</sup>: Cheatsheet for my own later reference:
git log --since=$(date +%Y-%m-%d --date='3 months ago') | grep ^Author: | sort | uniq
</small>
cfallin commented on Issue #3:
The FInal Call Period has elapsed with no other comments or feedback, so I will now merge this RFC. Thanks all!
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC