alexcrichton commented on Issue #2:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.
An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [ ] @pchickey
- [ ] @fitzgen
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @cfallin
- [ ] @iximeow
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Intel
- [ ] @abrown
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
fitzgen edited a comment on Issue #2:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.
An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [ ] @pchickey
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @cfallin
- [ ] @iximeow
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Intel
- [ ] @abrown
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
pchickey edited a comment on Issue #2:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.
An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [x] @pchickey
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [ ] @cfallin
- [ ] @iximeow
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Intel
- [ ] @abrown
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
alexcrichton edited a comment on Issue #2:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.
An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [x] @pchickey
- [x] @fitzgen
- [ ] @sunfishcode
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @iximeow
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Intel
- [ ] @abrown
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
tschneidereit commented on Issue #2:
@abrown would you be up for giving this a look? It's blocking #5 as well which you r+'d, and we're quite eager to merge both. (It's blocking #5 because of stack handling, and more on the implementation than the RFC side, to be clear.)
sunfishcode edited a comment on Issue #2:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.
An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [x] @pchickey
- [x] @fitzgen
- [x] @sunfishcode
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @iximeow
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Intel
- [ ] @abrown
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
alexcrichton edited a comment on Issue #2:
Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge
I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.
Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.
An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.
Stakeholders sign-off
Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.
Fastly
- [x] @alexcrichton
- [x] @pchickey
- [x] @fitzgen
- [x] @sunfishcode
- [x] @cfallin
- [ ] @iximeow
IBM
- [ ] @uweigand
Intel
- [x] @abrown
Mozilla
- [ ] @julian-seward1
- [ ] @yurydelendik
alexcrichton commented on Issue #2:
Entering Final Call Period
Once any stakeholder from a different group has signed off, the RFC will move into a 10 calendar day final comment period (FCP), long enough to ensure that other stakeholders have at least a full business week to respond.
The FCP will end on February 26th.
alexcrichton commented on Issue #2:
The FCP has elapsed without any objections being raised. I'm going to merge this. Thanks everybody!
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC