Stream: rfc-notifications

Topic: rfcs / Issue #2 RFC: Add `async` support to wasmtime


view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Jan 26 2021 at 15:30):

alexcrichton commented on Issue #2:

Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge

I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.

Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.

An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.

Stakeholders sign-off

Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.

Fastly

IBM

Intel

Mozilla

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Jan 26 2021 at 17:50):

fitzgen edited a comment on Issue #2:

Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge

I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.

Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.

An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.

Stakeholders sign-off

Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.

Fastly

IBM

Intel

Mozilla

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Jan 26 2021 at 17:53):

pchickey edited a comment on Issue #2:

Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge

I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.

Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.

An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.

Stakeholders sign-off

Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.

Fastly

IBM

Intel

Mozilla

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Jan 26 2021 at 17:55):

alexcrichton edited a comment on Issue #2:

Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge

I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.

Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.

An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.

Stakeholders sign-off

Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.

Fastly

IBM

Intel

Mozilla

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Feb 16 2021 at 19:10):

tschneidereit commented on Issue #2:

@abrown would you be up for giving this a look? It's blocking #5 as well which you r+'d, and we're quite eager to merge both. (It's blocking #5 because of stack handling, and more on the implementation than the RFC side, to be clear.)

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Feb 16 2021 at 19:43):

sunfishcode edited a comment on Issue #2:

Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge

I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.

Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.

An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.

Stakeholders sign-off

Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.

Fastly

IBM

Intel

Mozilla

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Feb 17 2021 at 15:09):

alexcrichton edited a comment on Issue #2:

Motion to finalize with a disposition to merge

I'm proposing that we merge this RFC.

Early feedback has been received and all requested outstanding changes to the proposal has been made.

An implementation in Wasmtime has already been started.

Stakeholders sign-off

Tagging all employees of BA-affiliated companies who have committed to the Wasmtime repo in the last three months plus anyone who has given feedback on this PR as a stakeholder.

Fastly

IBM

Intel

Mozilla

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Feb 17 2021 at 15:10):

alexcrichton commented on Issue #2:

Entering Final Call Period

https://github.com/bytecodealliance/rfcs/blob/main/accepted/rfc-process.md#making-a-decision-merge-or-close

Once any stakeholder from a different group has signed off, the RFC will move into a 10 calendar day final comment period (FCP), long enough to ensure that other stakeholders have at least a full business week to respond.

The FCP will end on February 26th.

view this post on Zulip RFC notifications bot (Feb 26 2021 at 15:10):

alexcrichton commented on Issue #2:

The FCP has elapsed without any objections being raised. I'm going to merge this. Thanks everybody!


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC