alexcrichton opened issue #9568:
In #NNNN the
memory_may_move
configuration knob was plumbed into memories themselves to limit the growth of the memory. This knob is not surfaced in the customMemoryCreator
trait, however, and memories created from that trait are pessimistically assumed to always possibly move in memory. This issue is intended to track refactoring this trait to improve this situation and enable plumbing the information a bit further.Ideally the
MemoryCreator
andRuntimeMemoryCreator
traits are merged. After looking at this for a bit this'll require some deeper refactoring to keep things making sense.
alexcrichton edited issue #9568:
In #9569 the
memory_may_move
configuration knob was plumbed into memories themselves to limit the growth of the memory. This knob is not surfaced in the customMemoryCreator
trait, however, and memories created from that trait are pessimistically assumed to always possibly move in memory. This issue is intended to track refactoring this trait to improve this situation and enable plumbing the information a bit further.Ideally the
MemoryCreator
andRuntimeMemoryCreator
traits are merged. After looking at this for a bit this'll require some deeper refactoring to keep things making sense.
alexcrichton closed issue #9568:
In #9569 the
memory_may_move
configuration knob was plumbed into memories themselves to limit the growth of the memory. This knob is not surfaced in the customMemoryCreator
trait, however, and memories created from that trait are pessimistically assumed to always possibly move in memory. This issue is intended to track refactoring this trait to improve this situation and enable plumbing the information a bit further.Ideally the
MemoryCreator
andRuntimeMemoryCreator
traits are merged. After looking at this for a bit this'll require some deeper refactoring to keep things making sense.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC