Userzxcvbvnm added the bug label to Issue #8831.
Userzxcvbvnm opened issue #8831:
Test Case
The c test case is:
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <wasi/api.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> int get_fd(const char *filename, int flags) { int fd = open(filename, flags); if (fd == -1) { printf("Get file descriptor of file %s failed!\n", filename); return -1; } else { printf("Get file descriptor of file %s succeed!\n", filename); return fd; } } void closebyfd(int fd) { if (close(fd) == -1) { printf("Close the file %d by descriptor failed!\n", fd); } } int fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd(int fd) { printf("Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd.\n"); int new_fd = get_fd("subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1", O_RDONLY); __wasi_errno_t result = __wasi_fd_renumber(fd, new_fd); if (result != 0) { printf("Error %d while renumbering file descriptors.\n", result); return result; } else { printf("Successful file descriptors %d.\n", result); printf("Leave fd_renumber_00001.\n"); closebyfd(new_fd); return result; } } int main() { int fd = get_fd("softfile_3", O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) { return -1; } fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd(fd); return 0; }
Steps to Reproduce
(1)compile to wasm:
./wasi-sdk-21.0/bin/clang --target=wasm32-unkown-wasi --sysroot=./wasi-sdk-21.0/share/wasi-sysroot test.c -o test.wasm
(2)Running wasm:
(Before run the Wasm file, file softfile_3, subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 and subdir_2/subdir_1/subfile_1 exists, and softfile_3 is softlink file points to file subdir_2/subdir_1/subfile_1.
Before run the Wasm file, change the permission of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 into 0200(-w-------) . )
wasmtime run --dir=. test.wasm
Expected Results
Print:
Get file descriptor of file softfile_3 succeed! Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd. Get file descriptor of file subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failed! Error 8 while renumbering file descriptors.
This is what WAMR and WasmEdge do.
Actual Results
wasmtime prints:
Get file descriptor of file softfile_3 succeed! Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd. Get file descriptor of file subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failed! Successful file descriptors 0. Leave fd_renumber_00001.
Since the permission of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 is 0200, which only contains write permission, and subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 is opened with O_RDONLY, getting the file descriptor of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failure is expected.
However, getting the file descriptor of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 fails, but renumbering file descriptors succeed.Versions and Environment
Wasmtime version or commit: 19.0.2
Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04
Architecture: x86_64
pchickey commented on issue #8831:
Wasmtime considers the entire space of u32 numbers as valid file descriptors for preview 1, so the renumber to
-1
is a renumber to4294967295
. I don't think this is a bug. It is still possible to show the call toopen
failed because the WASIfd_open
interface (implementsopen
inside libc) has a distinct way to return the failure vs successfully opening fd4294967295
.
Userzxcvbvnm edited issue #8831:
Test Case
The c test case is:
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <wasi/api.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> int get_fd(const char *filename, int flags) { int fd = open(filename, flags); if (fd == -1) { printf("Get file descriptor of file %s failed!\n", filename); return -1; } else { printf("Get file descriptor of file %s succeed!\n", filename); return fd; } } void closebyfd(int fd) { if (close(fd) == -1) { printf("Close the file %d by descriptor failed!\n", fd); } } int fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd(int fd) { printf("Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd.\n"); int new_fd = get_fd("subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1", O_RDONLY); __wasi_errno_t result = __wasi_fd_renumber(fd, new_fd); if (result != 0) { printf("Error %d while renumbering file descriptors.\n", result); return result; } else { printf("Successful file descriptors %d.\n", result); printf("Leave fd_renumber_00001.\n"); closebyfd(new_fd); return result; } } int main() { int fd = get_fd("softfile_3", O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) { return -1; } fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd(fd); return 0; }
Steps to Reproduce
(1)compile to wasm:
./wasi-sdk-21.0/bin/clang --target=wasm32-unkown-wasi --sysroot=./wasi-sdk-21.0/share/wasi-sysroot test.c -o test.wasm
(2)Running wasm:
(Before run the Wasm file, file softfile_3, subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 and subdir_2/subdir_1/subfile_1 exists, and softfile_3 is softlink file points to file subdir_2/subdir_1/subfile_1.
Before run the Wasm file, change the permission of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 into 0200(-w-------) . )
wasmtime run --dir=. test.wasm
Expected Results
Print:
Get file descriptor of file softfile_3 succeed! Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd. Get file descriptor of file subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failed! Error 8 while renumbering file descriptors.
This is what WAMR and WasmEdge do.
Actual Results
wasmtime prints:
Get file descriptor of file softfile_3 succeed! Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd. Get file descriptor of file subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failed! Successful file descriptors 0. Leave fd_renumber_00001.
Since the permission of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 is 0200, which only contains write permission, and subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 is opened with O_RDONLY, getting the file descriptor of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failure is expected.
However, getting the file descriptor of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 fails, but renumbering file descriptors succeed.Versions and Environment
Wasmtime version or commit: 19.0.2 and 13.0.1
Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04
Architecture: x86_64
tschneidereit closed issue #8831:
Test Case
The c test case is:
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <wasi/api.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> int get_fd(const char *filename, int flags) { int fd = open(filename, flags); if (fd == -1) { printf("Get file descriptor of file %s failed!\n", filename); return -1; } else { printf("Get file descriptor of file %s succeed!\n", filename); return fd; } } void closebyfd(int fd) { if (close(fd) == -1) { printf("Close the file %d by descriptor failed!\n", fd); } } int fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd(int fd) { printf("Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd.\n"); int new_fd = get_fd("subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1", O_RDONLY); __wasi_errno_t result = __wasi_fd_renumber(fd, new_fd); if (result != 0) { printf("Error %d while renumbering file descriptors.\n", result); return result; } else { printf("Successful file descriptors %d.\n", result); printf("Leave fd_renumber_00001.\n"); closebyfd(new_fd); return result; } } int main() { int fd = get_fd("softfile_3", O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) { return -1; } fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd(fd); return 0; }
Steps to Reproduce
(1)compile to wasm:
./wasi-sdk-21.0/bin/clang --target=wasm32-unkown-wasi --sysroot=./wasi-sdk-21.0/share/wasi-sysroot test.c -o test.wasm
(2)Running wasm:
(Before run the Wasm file, file softfile_3, subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 and subdir_2/subdir_1/subfile_1 exists, and softfile_3 is softlink file points to file subdir_2/subdir_1/subfile_1.
Before run the Wasm file, change the permission of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 into 0200(-w-------) . )
wasmtime run --dir=. test.wasm
Expected Results
Print:
Get file descriptor of file softfile_3 succeed! Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd. Get file descriptor of file subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failed! Error 8 while renumbering file descriptors.
This is what WAMR and WasmEdge do.
Actual Results
wasmtime prints:
Get file descriptor of file softfile_3 succeed! Enter function fd_renumber_00001_1x8fd. Get file descriptor of file subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failed! Successful file descriptors 0. Leave fd_renumber_00001.
Since the permission of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 is 0200, which only contains write permission, and subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 is opened with O_RDONLY, getting the file descriptor of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 failure is expected.
However, getting the file descriptor of subdir_1/subdir_2/subfile_1 fails, but renumbering file descriptors succeed.Versions and Environment
Wasmtime version or commit: 19.0.2 and 13.0.1
Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04
Architecture: x86_64
tschneidereit commented on issue #8831:
Closing per Pat's explanation, but feel free to reopen with an explanation if you disagree, @Userzxcvbvnm!
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC