Rodrigodd opened issue #7772:
Feature
Add all Cranelift crates (
cranelift-codegen
,cranelift-frontend
,cranelift-module
,cranelift-native
,cranelift-jit
,cranelift-object
, etc.) to thecranelift
umbrella crate, each one behind a feature preferably.Benefit
The
cranelift
crate is an "umbrella for commonly-used Cranelift crates" and "provides a convenient one-line dependency," but it just containsfrontend
andcodegen
, which is limited to creating in-memory JIT compilers. That means that if I expect to create a static compiler or generate object files in some form, I need to replace this crate with its underlying ones, defeating its purpose.It also helps keep all versions in sync and make all these crates a little more discoverable.
Alternatives
- Keep it the way it is: Cranelift has a focus on JIT compilation, so maybe these two crates are the only common ones, and the remaining ones are niche enough.
elliottt closed issue #7772:
Feature
Add all Cranelift crates (
cranelift-codegen
,cranelift-frontend
,cranelift-module
,cranelift-native
,cranelift-jit
,cranelift-object
, etc.) to thecranelift
umbrella crate, each one behind a feature preferably.Benefit
The
cranelift
crate is an "umbrella for commonly-used Cranelift crates" and "provides a convenient one-line dependency," but it just containsfrontend
andcodegen
, which is limited to creating in-memory JIT compilers. That means that if I expect to create a static compiler or generate object files in some form, I need to replace this crate with its underlying ones, defeating its purpose.It also helps keep all versions in sync and make all these crates a little more discoverable.
Alternatives
- Keep it the way it is: Cranelift has a focus on JIT compilation, so maybe these two crates are the only common ones, and the remaining ones are niche enough.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC