alexcrichton commented on issue #6960:
Oh interesting! So there's no way for the dwarf sections to actually refer to
.eh_frame
? It's required at the binary level that the information is duplicated?
SingleAccretion commented on issue #6960:
So there's no way for the dwarf sections to actually refer to .eh_frame? It's required at the binary level that the information is duplicated?
I am no great Unix expert myself, so do not know for certain. I _suspect_ that it is indeed possible for the debugger to use
.eh_frame
alone, though the two sections are a little different in format details as well as usage (.eh_frame
is like.pdata
on Windows in that it is "mandatory").FWIW, there are much larger (pun intended) size problems with
-g
-produced object files at the moment. For one, all the location lists for variables with are very fragmented, it would help a lot if they could always refer to the one and only stack location, at least for unoptimized code.
bjorn3 commented on issue #6960:
Rustc doesn't ever emit
.debug_frame
. The debugger has to use.eh_frame
for this information for rust code.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC