afonso360 opened issue #6827:
:wave: Hey,
.clif
Test Casetest interpret function %simd_ineg_i64x2(i64x2) -> i64x2 { block0(v0: i64x2): v1 = ineg v0 return v1 } ; run: %simd_ineg_i64x2([0 1]) == [0 -1]
Steps to Reproduce
cd cranelift
cargo run -- test ./the-above.clif
Expected Results
The test to pass!
Actual Results
ERROR cranelift_filetests::concurrent > FAIL: interpret FAIL ./lmao.clif: interpret Caused by: unexpected trap: StepError(ValueError(InvalidType(Integer, types::I64X2))) 1 tests Error: 1 failure
It looks like the
ineg
instruction in the interpreter is implemented for scalar values but not for SIMD!Versions and Environment
Cranelift version or commit: main
Operating system: Linux
Architecture: X86_64 (but it could be any really!)
Extra Info
I would suspect that this goes wrong in
DataValueExt::int(0, ctrl_ty)
, that operation seems to not be ready to produce SIMD values. We could change that and it might work!If anyone needs help working on this let me know!
afonso360 added the bug label to Issue #6827.
afonso360 added the good first issue label to Issue #6827.
afonso360 added the cranelift:E-easy label to Issue #6827.
afonso360 added the cranelift label to Issue #6827.
gurry commented on issue #6827:
Reproduces on Windows too.
afonso360 closed issue #6827:
:wave: Hey,
.clif
Test Casetest interpret function %simd_ineg_i64x2(i64x2) -> i64x2 { block0(v0: i64x2): v1 = ineg v0 return v1 } ; run: %simd_ineg_i64x2([0 1]) == [0 -1]
Steps to Reproduce
cd cranelift
cargo run -- test ./the-above.clif
Expected Results
The test to pass!
Actual Results
ERROR cranelift_filetests::concurrent > FAIL: interpret FAIL ./lmao.clif: interpret Caused by: unexpected trap: StepError(ValueError(InvalidType(Integer, types::I64X2))) 1 tests Error: 1 failure
It looks like the
ineg
instruction in the interpreter is implemented for scalar values but not for SIMD!Versions and Environment
Cranelift version or commit: main
Operating system: Linux
Architecture: X86_64 (but it could be any really!)
Extra Info
I would suspect that this goes wrong in
DataValueExt::int(0, ctrl_ty)
, that operation seems to not be ready to produce SIMD values. We could change that and it might work!If anyone needs help working on this let me know!
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC