Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #6786 riscv64: Missing implementations f...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 04:22):

candymate opened issue #6786:

Test Case

Any cases with v128.loadXXX or v128.storeXXX would work

One example

(module
  (type (;0;) (func (param i32 v128)))
  (func (;0;) (type 0) (param i32 v128)
    local.get 0
    local.get 1
    v128.store16_lane align=1 0
  )
  (export "main" (func 0))
)

Steps to Reproduce

Compiling any cases containing v128.loadXXX or v128.storeXXX leads to reaching unreachable code.
Such compilations lead to reaching the following codes

// cranelift/codegen/src/isa/riscv64/inst/args.rs:1289
pub(crate) fn from_type(t: Type) -> Self {
    if t.is_float() {
        return if t == F32 { Self::Flw } else { Self::Fld };
    }
    match t {
        R32 => Self::Lwu,
        R64 | I64 => Self::Ld,

        I8 => Self::Lb,
        I16 => Self::Lh,
        I32 => Self::Lw,
        _ => unreachable!(), // reaches here
    }
}
// cranelift/codegen/src/isa/riscv64/inst/args.rs:1338
pub(crate) fn from_type(t: Type) -> Self {
    if t.is_float() {
        return if t == F32 { Self::Fsw } else { Self::Fsd };
    }
    match t.bits() {
        1 | 8 => Self::Sb,
        16 => Self::Sh,
        32 => Self::Sw,
        64 => Self::Sd,
        _ => unreachable!(), // reaches here
    }
}

Steps are the following:

  1. git submodule update --init
  2. cargo run --release --target=riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu test.wasm

Expected Results

Successful compilation

Actual Results

Panics with 'internal error: entered unreachable code'

Versions and Environment

Wasmtime version or commit: v11.0.1 Release

Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04.6

Architecture: RISC-V64

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 04:22):

candymate added the bug label to Issue #6786.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 04:44):

cfallin commented on issue #6786:

SIMD support on RISC-V is still a work-in-progress; @afonso360 was contributing code a few opcodes at a time recently. So it's expected that this doesn't yet work, though contributions are welcome if you're interested in tackling this!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 08:43):

afonso360 commented on issue #6786:

:wave: Hey,

This code should work, but SIMD support only works on machines with Vector extensions.

Are you running this natively on a RISC-V machine? Or just using QEMU?

If you are running on QEMU you can add the following parameter to make -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 this compile and run.

If you are running on an actual RISC-V machine, please make sure it supports version 1.0 of the Vector Extension. I haven't tested with 0.7.1 (popular in a lot of current CPU's) but I doubt it would work since they are somewhat incompatible.

That being said, we should probably have a better error message for this stuff.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 08:44):

afonso360 edited a comment on issue #6786:

:wave: Hey,

This code should work, but SIMD support only works on machines with Vector extensions.

Are you running this natively on a RISC-V machine? Or just using QEMU?

If you are running on QEMU you can add the following parameter -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 to make this compile and run.

If you are running on an actual RISC-V machine, please make sure it supports version 1.0 of the Vector Extension. I haven't tested with 0.7.1 (popular in a lot of current CPU's) but I doubt it would work since they are somewhat incompatible.

That being said, we should probably have a better error message for this stuff.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 08:51):

afonso360 added the cranelift:area:riscv64 label to Issue #6786.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 08:52):

afonso360 edited a comment on issue #6786:

:wave: Hey,

This code should work, but SIMD support only works on machines with Vector extensions.

Are you running this natively on a RISC-V machine, or just using QEMU?

If you are running on QEMU you can add the following parameter -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 to make this compile and run.

If you are running on an actual RISC-V machine, please make sure it supports version 1.0 of the Vector Extension. I haven't tested with 0.7.1 (popular in a lot of current CPU's) but I doubt it would work since they are somewhat incompatible.

That being said, we should probably have a better error message for this stuff.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 08:52):

afonso360 edited a comment on issue #6786:

:wave: Hey,

This code should work, but SIMD support only works on machines with Vector extensions.

Are you running this natively on a RISC-V machine, or just using QEMU?

If you are running on QEMU you can add the following parameter -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 to the QEMU arguments to make this compile and run.

If you are running on an actual RISC-V machine, please make sure it supports version 1.0 of the Vector Extension. I haven't tested with 0.7.1 (popular in a lot of current CPU's) but I doubt it would work since they are somewhat incompatible.

That being said, we should probably have a better error message for this stuff.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 31 2023 at 09:06):

afonso360 edited a comment on issue #6786:

:wave: Hey,

This code should work, but SIMD support only works on machines with Vector extensions.

Are you running this natively on a RISC-V machine, or just using QEMU?

If you are running on QEMU you can add the following parameter -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 to the QEMU arguments to make this compile and run.

If you are running on an actual RISC-V machine, please make sure it supports version 1.0 of the Vector Extension and that this is reported in /proc/cpuinfo. I haven't tested with 0.7.1 (popular in a lot of current CPU's) but I doubt it would work since they are somewhat incompatible.

That being said, we should probably have a better error message for this stuff.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 01 2023 at 02:34):

candymate commented on issue #6786:

Hi,

I'm currently running QEMU, so I added the parameter you gave me. But, it doesn't change anything.

In ~/.cargo/config.toml, I have the following:

[target.riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu]
linker = "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc"
runner = "qemu-riscv64 -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 -L /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib -E WASMTIME_TEST_NO_HOG_MEMORY=1"

Just in case, I upgraded Ubuntu to 22.04, and built qemu-riscv64 from the latest version of riscv-gnu-toolchain. (https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain)

Versions I'm using are the following:

$ qemu-riscv64 --version
qemu-riscv64 version 7.1.0 (v7.1.0)
$ riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc --version
riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0

Still leads to the following error message. (Ran with a simple wrapper to provide Wasm memory)

     Running `qemu-riscv64 -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 -L /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib -E WASMTIME_TEST_NO_HOG_MEMORY=1 target/riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/wasmtime-wrapper input`
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code', /home/candymate/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/cranelift-codegen-0.98.1/src/isa/riscv64/inst/args.rs:1347:18
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

It would be helpful if you tell me what I'm missing.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 01 2023 at 02:37):

candymate edited a comment on issue #6786:

Hi,

I'm currently running QEMU, so I added the parameter you gave me. But, it doesn't change anything.

In ~/.cargo/config.toml, I have the following:

[target.riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu]
linker = "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc"
runner = "qemu-riscv64 -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 -L /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib -E WASMTIME_TEST_NO_HOG_MEMORY=1"

Just in case, I upgraded Ubuntu to 22.04, and built qemu-riscv64 from the latest version of riscv-gnu-toolchain. (https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain)

Versions I'm using are the following:

$ rustc --version
rustc 1.71.0-nightly (ce5919fce 2023-05-15)
$ qemu-riscv64 --version
qemu-riscv64 version 7.1.0 (v7.1.0)
$ riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc --version
riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0

Still leads to the following error message. (Ran with a simple wrapper to provide Wasm memory)

     Running `qemu-riscv64 -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 -L /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib -E WASMTIME_TEST_NO_HOG_MEMORY=1 target/riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/wasmtime-wrapper input`
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code', /home/candymate/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/cranelift-codegen-0.98.1/src/isa/riscv64/inst/args.rs:1347:18
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

It would be helpful if you tell me what I'm missing.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 01 2023 at 02:37):

candymate edited a comment on issue #6786:

Hi,

I'm currently running QEMU, so I added the parameter you gave me. But, it doesn't change anything.

In ~/.cargo/config.toml, I have the following:

[target.riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu]
linker = "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc"
runner = "qemu-riscv64 -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 -L /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib -E WASMTIME_TEST_NO_HOG_MEMORY=1"

Just in case, I upgraded Ubuntu to 22.04, and built qemu-riscv64 from the latest version of riscv-gnu-toolchain. (https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain)

Versions I'm using are the following:

$ cargo --version
cargo 1.71.0-nightly (13413c64f 2023-05-10)
$ rustc --version
rustc 1.71.0-nightly (ce5919fce 2023-05-15)
$ qemu-riscv64 --version
qemu-riscv64 version 7.1.0 (v7.1.0)
$ riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc --version
riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0

Still leads to the following error message. (Ran with a simple wrapper to provide Wasm memory)

     Running `qemu-riscv64 -cpu rv64,v=true,vlen=128,vext_spec=v1.0 -L /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/lib -E WASMTIME_TEST_NO_HOG_MEMORY=1 target/riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/wasmtime-wrapper input`
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code', /home/candymate/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/cranelift-codegen-0.98.1/src/isa/riscv64/inst/args.rs:1347:18
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

It would be helpful if you tell me what I'm missing.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 01 2023 at 11:09):

afonso360 commented on issue #6786:

Oh! Right, QEMU only gained the ability to emulate /proc/cpuinfo in version 8.1, we use that to detect the features of the processor and automatically enable them.

To manually force it on, you can use the wasmtime flag --cranelift-enable has_v, which should forcefully enable them on our side.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 02 2023 at 02:27):

candymate commented on issue #6786:

Adding the has_v flag solved the problem. Thanks!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 02 2023 at 02:27):

candymate closed issue #6786:

Test Case

Any cases with v128.loadXXX or v128.storeXXX would work

One example

(module
  (type (;0;) (func (param i32 v128)))
  (func (;0;) (type 0) (param i32 v128)
    local.get 0
    local.get 1
    v128.store16_lane align=1 0
  )
  (export "main" (func 0))
)

Steps to Reproduce

Compiling any cases containing v128.loadXXX or v128.storeXXX leads to reaching unreachable code.
Such compilations lead to reaching the following codes

// cranelift/codegen/src/isa/riscv64/inst/args.rs:1289
pub(crate) fn from_type(t: Type) -> Self {
    if t.is_float() {
        return if t == F32 { Self::Flw } else { Self::Fld };
    }
    match t {
        R32 => Self::Lwu,
        R64 | I64 => Self::Ld,

        I8 => Self::Lb,
        I16 => Self::Lh,
        I32 => Self::Lw,
        _ => unreachable!(), // reaches here
    }
}
// cranelift/codegen/src/isa/riscv64/inst/args.rs:1338
pub(crate) fn from_type(t: Type) -> Self {
    if t.is_float() {
        return if t == F32 { Self::Fsw } else { Self::Fsd };
    }
    match t.bits() {
        1 | 8 => Self::Sb,
        16 => Self::Sh,
        32 => Self::Sw,
        64 => Self::Sd,
        _ => unreachable!(), // reaches here
    }
}

Steps are the following:

  1. git submodule update --init
  2. cargo run --release --target=riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu test.wasm

Expected Results

Successful compilation

Actual Results

Panics with 'internal error: entered unreachable code'

Versions and Environment

Wasmtime version or commit: v11.0.1 Release

Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04.6

Architecture: RISC-V64


Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC