fitzgen opened issue #6659:
And allow passing in arbitrary values as
vmctx
as well, basically treating it like any other argument.While this wouldn't allow complex global values based on the
vmctx
, it would allow simple ones likegv0 = vmctx
.We would also want the CLIF interpreter to support this as well, since basically all of our runtests are also interpreter tests.
fitzgen labeled issue #6659:
And allow passing in arbitrary values as
vmctx
as well, basically treating it like any other argument.While this wouldn't allow complex global values based on the
vmctx
, it would allow simple ones likegv0 = vmctx
.We would also want the CLIF interpreter to support this as well, since basically all of our runtests are also interpreter tests.
afonso360 commented on issue #6659:
We used to have some limited support for
vmctx
and global values in the interpreter (#4396). But that was essentially just used to support custom heaps, and was removed in (#5386).We can still resolve
global_value
's in the interpreter, so we should still be able to use it, but we might have to manually call the function and pass the address to a stack slot or something along those lines.Is that what you were looking to do?
We don't support something like
; run: %test(vmctx, 1, 2, 3) == 10
, but I'm not sure what we would pass in instead ofvmctx
in the runtests.<details>
<summary>Here's an example testcase usingvmctx
that works today</summary>test interpret test run target x86_64 target s390x target aarch64 target riscv64 function %vm_state() -> i64 { fn0 = %load_at_0_and_add(i64 vmctx) -> i64 ;; This is our vmctx struct ss1 = explicit_slot 8 block0: ;; Store a 1 in the vmctx struct v1 = iconst.i64 1 stack_store.i64 v1, ss1 ;; Call %load_at_0_and_add with vmctx v2 = stack_addr.i64 ss1 v3 = call fn0(v2) return v3 } ; run: %vm_state() == 2 function %load_at_0_and_add(i64 vmctx) -> i64 { gv0 = vmctx gv1 = load.i64 notrap aligned gv0+0 block0(v0: i64): v1 = global_value.i64 gv1 v2 = iadd_imm.i64 v1, 1 return v2 }
</details>
fitzgen commented on issue #6659:
I was essentially trying to do something like this:
function %stack_limit(i64 vmctx, i64) -> i64 { gv0 = vmctx stack_limit = gv0 block0(v0: i64, v1: i64): return v1 } ; run(0, 42) == 42
fitzgen commented on issue #6659:
I guess I could have got that working with another trampoline function to init the vmctx, that's a good trick. Still a bit of a workaround though compared to just passing in a value.
afonso360 commented on issue #6659:
Oh, weird that it doesn't work when we call the vmctx function directly. That should be a somewhat easy fix, I don't mind working on it.
I think we don't support stack_limit in the interpreter yet though.
afonso360 assigned issue #6659 to afonso360.
fitzgen closed issue #6659:
And allow passing in arbitrary values as
vmctx
as well, basically treating it like any other argument.While this wouldn't allow complex global values based on the
vmctx
, it would allow simple ones likegv0 = vmctx
.We would also want the CLIF interpreter to support this as well, since basically all of our runtests are also interpreter tests.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC