Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #6530 Cranelift: get the `tail` calling ...

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2023 at 20:49):

fitzgen opened issue #6530:

          I'm having a hard time figuring out the details of s390x here, so I am going to disable support for the `tail` calling convention on s390x (with a loud assertion) to land this PR. We can get s390x working in follow ups.

_Originally posted by @fitzgen in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/6500#issuecomment-1579427510_

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2023 at 20:50):

fitzgen edited issue #6530:

I'm having a hard time figuring out the details of s390x here, so I am going to disable support for the tail calling convention on s390x (with a loud assertion) to land this PR. We can get s390x working in follow ups.

_Originally posted by @fitzgen in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/6500#issuecomment-1579427510_

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2023 at 20:53):

fitzgen labeled issue #6530:

I'm having a hard time figuring out the details of s390x here, so I am going to disable support for the tail calling convention on s390x (with a loud assertion) to land this PR. We can get s390x working in follow ups.

_Originally posted by @fitzgen in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/6500#issuecomment-1579427510_

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2023 at 20:53):

fitzgen labeled issue #6530:

I'm having a hard time figuring out the details of s390x here, so I am going to disable support for the tail calling convention on s390x (with a loud assertion) to land this PR. We can get s390x working in follow ups.

_Originally posted by @fitzgen in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/6500#issuecomment-1579427510_

Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC