saulecabrera commented on issue #6468:
You mentioned fuzz testing being your main approach now. I wasn't sure how to do that, but would happily go run some if you can point me in the right direction.
Yeah, unfortunately you won't be able to get local fuzzing working for
aarch64
working since it will at least require support forcall
, which we don't have yet. It shouldn't be to complex to get going though with all the recent work that we've done for supporting function calls and trampolines.
saulecabrera edited a comment on issue #6468:
You mentioned fuzz testing being your main approach now. I wasn't sure how to do that, but would happily go run some if you can point me in the right direction.
Yeah, unfortunately you won't be able to get local fuzzing working for
aarch64
working since it will at least require support forcall
, which we don't have yet. It might not be too complex to get going though with all the recent work that we've done for supporting function calls and trampolines.
saulecabrera edited a comment on issue #6468:
You mentioned fuzz testing being your main approach now. I wasn't sure how to do that, but would happily go run some if you can point me in the right direction.
Yeah, unfortunately you won't be able to get local fuzzing working for
aarch64
working since it will at least require support forcall
, which we don't have yet. It might not be too complex to get going though with all the recent work that we've done for supporting function calls and trampolines in x64.
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #6468:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @saulecabrera
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "winch"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- saulecabrera: winch
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
jimmyhmiller commented on issue #6468:
@saulecabrera Fixed. Sorry for the late responses on these. My notifications were still going to my old work email. Fixed now.
saulecabrera commented on issue #6468:
Thanks for the fixes! There's a failure in the updated
sub
tests forx64
, because the output doesn't match (as expected), you should be able to fix that by runningWINCH_TEST_BLESS=1 cargo run -- test
inside thewinch
directory.
jimmyhmiller commented on issue #6468:
Yeah, sorry my bad. Totally thought I ran that a second time. Fixed now.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC