cfallin commented on issue #6120:
Taking a look!
cfallin commented on issue #6120:
@Kmeakin it looks like this is still not quite a verbatim move, which is making it tricky for me to verify -- e.g., this rule
;; Optimize icmp-of-icmp. (rule (simplify (ne ty (uextend _ inner @ (icmp ty _ _ _)) (iconst _ (u64_from_imm64 0)))) (subsume inner))
became
;; Optimize icmp-of-icmp: (rule (simplify (ne ty (uextend _ inner @ (icmp ty _ _ _)) (iconst _ (u64_from_imm64 0)))) (subsume inner))
I'm trying not to be too picky but I also find it much easier if code motion isn't mixed in with re-formatting, change of comments, etc.; if you don't mind, would you be able to redo the code-motion with a straight copy-paste, keeping things in the same order, then we can do other refactors later?
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC