Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #5919 Codegen fix atomic_cas with samll...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 03:17):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5919:

The test failure indicate a s930x has a wrong resule too.
I think target interpreter and x86_64 can pass.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 03:18):

yuyang-ok edited a comment on issue #5919:

The test failure indicates a s930x has a wrong resule too ???
I think target interpreter and x86_64 can pass.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 04:02):

yuyang-ok edited a comment on issue #5919:

The test failure indicates a s930x has a wrong result too ???
I think target interpreter and x86_64 can pass.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 04:45):

yuyang-ok edited a comment on issue #5919:

The test failure indicates s930x has a wrong result too ???
I think target interpreter and x86_64 can pass.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 05:30):

yuyang-ok edited a comment on issue #5919:

The test failure indicates s390x has a wrong result too ???
I think target interpreter and x86_64 can pass.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 12:32):

afonso360 commented on issue #5919:

Oh that's right, this test is not endianness independent! If you change the store to store little and the atomic_cas to atomic_cas little it should start passing on all arches!

<details>
<summary>New Testcase</summary>

test interpret
test run
target aarch64
target s390x
target x86_64
target riscv64

function %a(i8) -> i8 sext system_v {
    ss2 = explicit_slot 2

block0(v0: i8):
    v2 = iconst.i16 0x00ff
    v3 = stack_addr.i64 ss2
    store little v2, v3

    v4 = stack_addr.i64 ss2+1
    v5 = atomic_cas little v4, v0, v0
    return v5
}

; run: %a(0) == 0

</details>

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 04 2023 at 07:54):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5919:

@afonso360 Sure.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 06 2023 at 01:11):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5919:

@afonso360 I think we are ready.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 06 2023 at 11:25):

afonso360 commented on issue #5919:

I think we are still missing the fix for the 32 bit case, now that we are no longer using t0

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 06 2023 at 11:26):

afonso360 edited a comment on issue #5919:

I think we are still missing the fix for the 32 bit extend, now that we are no longer using t0

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 06 2023 at 11:37):

afonso360 edited a comment on issue #5919:

We are still missing the fix for the 32 bit extend, now that we are no longer using t0

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 07 2023 at 01:10):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5919:

@afonso360 Sorry.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 07 2023 at 11:53):

afonso360 commented on issue #5919:

LGTM!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 07 2023 at 11:53):

afonso360 edited a comment on issue #5919:

LGTM! Thanks!


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC