Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #5898 Fix codegen riscv64 atomic_rmw_loo...

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 02 2023 at 02:07):

jameysharp commented on issue #5898:

This is failing the test in tests/spec_testsuite/proposals/threads/atomic.wast on line 142, because atomic_rmw is expected to return the _old_ value at the address, not the newly-written value.

To fix #5884, I think you should write the result of AtomicOP::extract to dst instead of writing it to t0, and update later instructions accordingly.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 02 2023 at 02:33):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5898:

@jameysharp , Thanks, The atomic_rmw_loop kinda of little complex. I think I want to recheck it when I have time.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 02 2023 at 02:55):

jameysharp commented on issue #5898:

Yeah, I had a difficult time understanding what the loop was doing. I suspect we can improve it, and I'd be happy to discuss it further when you have time.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 02 2023 at 03:23):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5898:

@jameysharp sure.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 01:15):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5898:

There is a CI failure Without errors.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 02:00):

jameysharp commented on issue #5898:

I tried re-running just the failed CI jobs, but then extra jobs ran, which failed without useful logs, and I don't understand why. I'll have to look into this again next week if nobody else gets to it first.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 03 2023 at 02:39):

yuyang-ok commented on issue #5898:

@jameysharp Ok,thanks.

Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC