tmngo opened issue #5237:
Based on the above Zulip topic, I made this issue and attached the generated CLIF.
I'm using Cranelift as a backend for a language I'm working on. I also have an LLVM backend (via Inkwell). While messing around with some test code, I noticed that for a very large function (10000+ lines), my Cranelift backend takes longer (~4.0s) to generate code than my LLVM backend (~1.5s). Here's my crude test case source, which continues on for about 10000 lines.
![Screenshot 2022-11-09 032154](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/40331937/200924038-deab1c9f-362f-4f10-b9fb-314cd37626e0.png)
define_function main: 3.4641968s ======== ======== ================================== Total Self Pass -------- -------- ---------------------------------- 1.090 0.696 Verify Cranelift IR 0.314 0.314 Verify CPU flags 6.916 0.161 Compilation passes 0.040 0.040 Control flow graph 0.060 0.060 Dominator tree 0.000 0.000 Remove unreachable blocks 0.009 0.009 Remove constant phi-nodes 0.466 0.466 VCode lowering 0.225 0.225 VCode emission 0.001 0.001 VCode emission finalization 1.487 1.487 Register allocation ======== ======== ==================================
cfallin commented on issue #5237:
@tmngo we can definitely look into this; we have some long-running efforts to find ways to speed things up. One quick thing I would note though is that you have the verifier enabled. You can disable that (the Cranelift setting is
enable_verifier
) for a bit of a speedup.
tmngo commented on issue #5237:
Thanks! That definitely closes the gap a decent amount.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC