Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 20 2022 at 11:51): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 20 2022 at 11:51):saulecabrera commented on issue #4907:
Thanks for the feedback @cfallin; I'll go through each of the review items separately; at a high-level I think that I'd like to tackle some of the refactoring items in this PR (e.g. moving winch to a top level directory and using that in
wasmtime-winch) to have a common base moving forward, it shouldn't be too complicated and hopefully the rebasing won't be too bad either.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 25 2022 at 22:27):saulecabrera commented on issue #4907:
@cfallin I've addressed all the review items, this is ready for another pass. I decided to tackle the major refactoring items in this PR, so now the structure looks like:
winch/src/main: the CLI tool (winch-tools)winch/codegen: all the code generation pieces (winch-codegen)crates/winch: the wasmtime integration (winch-wasmtime)I had a brief battle with the
CI/verify-publishjob, but I think that I got the handle of the expected structure; I'd appreciate a verification there (I was thinking maybe @alexcrichton could peek and confirm too).
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 25 2022 at 22:39):saulecabrera commented on issue #4907:
Hmm it seems that my change to address the comments formatting got lost. Looking into this.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 25 2022 at 23:07):saulecabrera commented on issue #4907:
Hmm it seems that my change to address the comments formatting got lost. Looking into this.
Formatting was indeed missing. It was an oversight from my end.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 25 2022 at 23:26):saulecabrera edited a comment on issue #4907:
Hmm it seems that my change to address the comment formatting got lost. Looking into this.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC