alexcrichton labeled issue #4812:
Local bisection points to #4730 for this issue but that seems like it may also be just as likely to expose a preexisting issue. Reproducing this is somewhat nontrivial and
wasm-tools shrink
was pretty unsuccessful on this test case.Using this input test case on an x86_64 machine this crash can be reproduced with:
$ cargo run -q \ run foo.wasm \ --wasm-features all \ --enable-cranelift-nan-canonicalization \ --wasm-timeout 20 \ -g zsh: segmentation fault cargo run -q run $HOME/foo.wasm --wasm-features all --wasm-timeout 20 -g
Note that this reproduction is quite specific to layout of code and the various options enabled here are all required with the input wasm above.
cc @elliottt
alexcrichton opened issue #4812:
Local bisection points to #4730 for this issue but that seems like it may also be just as likely to expose a preexisting issue. Reproducing this is somewhat nontrivial and
wasm-tools shrink
was pretty unsuccessful on this test case.Using this input test case on an x86_64 machine this crash can be reproduced with:
$ cargo run -q \ run foo.wasm \ --wasm-features all \ --enable-cranelift-nan-canonicalization \ --wasm-timeout 20 \ -g zsh: segmentation fault cargo run -q run $HOME/foo.wasm --wasm-features all --wasm-timeout 20 -g
Note that this reproduction is quite specific to layout of code and the various options enabled here are all required with the input wasm above.
cc @elliottt
elliottt commented on issue #4812:
When I run the test case I get the following output:
% cargo run -q run ./foo.wasm --wasm-features all --enable-cranelift-nan-canonicalization --wasm-timeout 20 -g Error: failed to run main module `./foo.wasm` Caused by: 0: failed to instantiate "./foo.wasm" 1: wasm trap: integer overflow wasm backtrace: 0: 0x61 - <unknown>!<wasm function 1>
elliottt commented on issue #4812:
I thought to try your example on cee4b209f346ea279490268fe434dc52d0e0680c (the commit where #4730 was merged) and it did indeed segfault. Could the behavior I'm seeing on
main
be due to the fix for #4761 that was fixed in #4790?
alexcrichton commented on issue #4812:
Oh you know it was probably something to do with
--disable-cache
where my bisection went awry. I always forget to pass that flag, alas!In that case yeah it looks like this is fixed locally so I'll close.
alexcrichton closed issue #4812:
Local bisection points to #4730 for this issue but that seems like it may also be just as likely to expose a preexisting issue. Reproducing this is somewhat nontrivial and
wasm-tools shrink
was pretty unsuccessful on this test case.Using this input test case on an x86_64 machine this crash can be reproduced with:
$ cargo run -q \ run foo.wasm \ --wasm-features all \ --enable-cranelift-nan-canonicalization \ --wasm-timeout 20 \ -g zsh: segmentation fault cargo run -q run $HOME/foo.wasm --wasm-features all --wasm-timeout 20 -g
Note that this reproduction is quite specific to layout of code and the various options enabled here are all required with the input wasm above.
cc @elliottt
alexcrichton reopened issue #4812:
Local bisection points to #4730 for this issue but that seems like it may also be just as likely to expose a preexisting issue. Reproducing this is somewhat nontrivial and
wasm-tools shrink
was pretty unsuccessful on this test case.Using this input test case on an x86_64 machine this crash can be reproduced with:
$ cargo run -q \ run foo.wasm \ --wasm-features all \ --enable-cranelift-nan-canonicalization \ --wasm-timeout 20 \ -g zsh: segmentation fault cargo run -q run $HOME/foo.wasm --wasm-features all --wasm-timeout 20 -g
Note that this reproduction is quite specific to layout of code and the various options enabled here are all required with the input wasm above.
cc @elliottt
alexcrichton commented on issue #4812:
According to oss-fuzz the original test case here still crashes and trying again locally I'm able to reproduce:
$ cargo run -q run --disable-cache testcase42.wasm --wasm-features all --cranelift-set wasmtime_linkopt_padding_between_functions=1 zsh: segmentation fault cargo run -q run --disable-cache testcase42.wat --wasm-features all
with testcase42.wasm.gz as an input. This is probably related to the
wasmtime_linkopt_padding_between_functions
option which is pretty nonstandard and only there for the fuzzers, but it may mean that there's a missing alignment calculation for when a function starts?
alexcrichton commented on issue #4812:
Oh and to log, the reproduction for me locally is on 1a59b3e6c65cdc6510c6c9e98dd694a5a2e85a2d which should be
main
as of this writing
elliottt commented on issue #4812:
It's definitely coming from the
fcopysign
lowering:% lldb -- cargo run -q run --disable-cache testcase42.wasm --wasm-features all --cranelift-set wasmtime_linkopt_padding_between_functions=1 ... Process 3067456 stopped * thread #1, name = 'wasmtime', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: invalid address (fault address: 0x0) frame #0: 0x00007ffff6c57b3b -> 0x7ffff6c57b3b: andnps 0x24ef(%rip), %xmm6 0x7ffff6c57b42: andps %xmm3, %xmm4 0x7ffff6c57b45: orps %xmm4, %xmm6 0x7ffff6c57b48: movl $0x4f000000, %edx ; imm = 0x4F000000 (lldb) disassemble -e 0x7ffff6c57b50 -s 0x7ffff6c57b0b 0x7ffff6c57b0b: jge 0x7ffff6c57b13 0x7ffff6c57b11: ud2 0x7ffff6c57b13: addl $0x80000000, %edx ; imm = 0x80000000 0x7ffff6c57b19: movl %edx, %eax 0x7ffff6c57b1b: cvtsi2ss %rax, %xmm3 0x7ffff6c57b20: movl $0x80000000, %eax ; imm = 0x80000000 0x7ffff6c57b25: movd %eax, %xmm4 0x7ffff6c57b29: xorps %xmm4, %xmm3 0x7ffff6c57b2c: movl $0x80000000, %r11d ; imm = 0x80000000 0x7ffff6c57b32: movd %r11d, %xmm4 0x7ffff6c57b37: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm6 -> 0x7ffff6c57b3b: andnps 0x24ef(%rip), %xmm6 0x7ffff6c57b42: andps %xmm3, %xmm4 0x7ffff6c57b45: orps %xmm4, %xmm6 0x7ffff6c57b48: movl $0x4f000000, %edx ; imm = 0x4F000000 (lldb) register read eax eax = 0x80000000 (lldb) register read rip rip = 0x00007ffff6c57b3b
Prelude> (0x24ef + 0x00007ffff6c57b3b) `divMod` 16 (8796083345922,10)
elliottt closed issue #4812:
Local bisection points to #4730 for this issue but that seems like it may also be just as likely to expose a preexisting issue. Reproducing this is somewhat nontrivial and
wasm-tools shrink
was pretty unsuccessful on this test case.Using this input test case on an x86_64 machine this crash can be reproduced with:
$ cargo run -q \ run foo.wasm \ --wasm-features all \ --enable-cranelift-nan-canonicalization \ --wasm-timeout 20 \ -g zsh: segmentation fault cargo run -q run $HOME/foo.wasm --wasm-features all --wasm-timeout 20 -g
Note that this reproduction is quite specific to layout of code and the various options enabled here are all required with the input wasm above.
cc @elliottt
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC