MaxGraey opened issue #4803:
fneg(fabs(x))
could be possible aftercopysign(x, -C) -> fneg(fabs(x))
peephole optimization on LLVM / Binaryen, so I guess it's make sense to simplify it further on cranelift during lowering stage for all archs. For example, onx64
it will be just singleorps xmm, [0x8000000000000000, 0x8000000000000000]
(pseudocode) instruction.
MaxGraey edited issue #4803:
fneg(fabs(x))
could be possible aftercopysign(x, -C) -> fneg(fabs(x))
peephole optimization on LLVM / Binaryen, so I guess it's make sense to simplify it further on cranelift during lowering stage for all archs. For example, onx64
it will be just singleorps xmm, ptr [0x8000000000000000, 0x8000000000000000]
(pseudocode) instruction.
MaxGraey edited issue #4803:
fneg(fabs(x))
could be possible aftercopysign(x, -C) -> fneg(fabs(x))
peephole optimization on LLVM / Binaryen, so I guess it's make sense to simplify it further on cranelift during lowering stage forx64
it will be just singleorps xmm, ptr [0x8000000000000000, 0x8000000000000000]
(pseudocode) instruction.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC