Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #4484 cranelift: Introduce a feature to ...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 21 2022 at 08:12):

bnjbvr commented on issue #4484:

To confirm, does this problem stem from the desire to enable trace logging for some modules in your program, but not the cranelift modules?

Yes indeed.

In such a situation is the logging framework's implementation of "no, don't actually emit this trace log" for the cranelift crates too expensive?

Yes, specifically we create something that we feed the log calls (and that's the expensive part here), but then the logger implementation decides to throw it away based on its own configuration.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 29 2022 at 22:58):

cfallin commented on issue #4484:

I think it needs a rebase again now that #4553 merged; happy to merge once that is in.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 29 2022 at 22:58):

cfallin edited a comment on issue #4484:

I think it needs a rebase again now that #4553 merged; happy to merge once rebased.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 01 2022 at 09:19):

bnjbvr commented on issue #4484:

This now passes CI and as there wasn't any pending comment, will merge. Thanks for the review!


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC