afonso360 opened issue #4406:
:wave: Hey,
As a followup to #4403, it looks like we are wrongly lowering
icmp of
andicmp nof
on thex86_64
backend fori128
values.
.clif
Test Casetest run set enable_llvm_abi_extensions=true target x86_64 function %icmp_of_i128(i128, i128) -> b1 { block0(v0: i128, v1: i128): v2 = icmp.i128 of v0, v1 return v2 } ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(-1, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 1) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000001) == false
There is a more comprehensive testsuite for this in tree at
cranelift/filetests/filetests/runtests/i128-icmp-overflow.clif
.Steps to Reproduce
clif-util test ./the-above.clif
Expected Results
The tests to pass.
Actual Results
Running `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` skipped .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: host can't run Aarch64(Aarch64) programs FAIL .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: run Caused by: Failed test: run: %icmp_of_i128(-170141183460469231731687303715884105728, 1) == true, actual: false 1 tests Error: 1 failure error: process didn't exit successfully: `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` (exit code: 1)
Versions and Environment
Cranelift version or commit:
main
Operating system: Windows
Architecture:x86_64
Extra Info
We also do some weird codegen compared to llvm:
Here's what we generate:
push rbp mov rbp, rsp mov r10, r8 cmp rdx, r9 seto al sete r8b mov rdx, r10 cmp rcx, rdx seto r9b and r8, r9 or rax, r8 and rax, 1 mov rsp, rbp pop rbp ret
VS llvm's implementation:
cmp rdi, rdx sbb rsi, rcx seto al ret
afonso360 labeled issue #4406:
:wave: Hey,
As a followup to #4403, it looks like we are wrongly lowering
icmp of
andicmp nof
on thex86_64
backend fori128
values.
.clif
Test Casetest run set enable_llvm_abi_extensions=true target x86_64 function %icmp_of_i128(i128, i128) -> b1 { block0(v0: i128, v1: i128): v2 = icmp.i128 of v0, v1 return v2 } ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(-1, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 1) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000001) == false
There is a more comprehensive testsuite for this in tree at
cranelift/filetests/filetests/runtests/i128-icmp-overflow.clif
.Steps to Reproduce
clif-util test ./the-above.clif
Expected Results
The tests to pass.
Actual Results
Running `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` skipped .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: host can't run Aarch64(Aarch64) programs FAIL .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: run Caused by: Failed test: run: %icmp_of_i128(-170141183460469231731687303715884105728, 1) == true, actual: false 1 tests Error: 1 failure error: process didn't exit successfully: `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` (exit code: 1)
Versions and Environment
Cranelift version or commit:
main
Operating system: Windows
Architecture:x86_64
Extra Info
We also do some weird codegen compared to llvm:
Here's what we generate:
push rbp mov rbp, rsp mov r10, r8 cmp rdx, r9 seto al sete r8b mov rdx, r10 cmp rcx, rdx seto r9b and r8, r9 or rax, r8 and rax, 1 mov rsp, rbp pop rbp ret
VS llvm's implementation:
cmp rdi, rdx sbb rsi, rcx seto al ret
afonso360 labeled issue #4406:
:wave: Hey,
As a followup to #4403, it looks like we are wrongly lowering
icmp of
andicmp nof
on thex86_64
backend fori128
values.
.clif
Test Casetest run set enable_llvm_abi_extensions=true target x86_64 function %icmp_of_i128(i128, i128) -> b1 { block0(v0: i128, v1: i128): v2 = icmp.i128 of v0, v1 return v2 } ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(-1, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 1) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000001) == false
There is a more comprehensive testsuite for this in tree at
cranelift/filetests/filetests/runtests/i128-icmp-overflow.clif
.Steps to Reproduce
clif-util test ./the-above.clif
Expected Results
The tests to pass.
Actual Results
Running `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` skipped .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: host can't run Aarch64(Aarch64) programs FAIL .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: run Caused by: Failed test: run: %icmp_of_i128(-170141183460469231731687303715884105728, 1) == true, actual: false 1 tests Error: 1 failure error: process didn't exit successfully: `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` (exit code: 1)
Versions and Environment
Cranelift version or commit:
main
Operating system: Windows
Architecture:x86_64
Extra Info
We also do some weird codegen compared to llvm:
Here's what we generate:
push rbp mov rbp, rsp mov r10, r8 cmp rdx, r9 seto al sete r8b mov rdx, r10 cmp rcx, rdx seto r9b and r8, r9 or rax, r8 and rax, 1 mov rsp, rbp pop rbp ret
VS llvm's implementation:
cmp rdi, rdx sbb rsi, rcx seto al ret
cfallin commented on issue #4406:
cc @abrown @jlb6740
jameysharp closed issue #4406:
:wave: Hey,
As a followup to #4403, it looks like we are wrongly lowering
icmp of
andicmp nof
on thex86_64
backend fori128
values.
.clif
Test Casetest run set enable_llvm_abi_extensions=true target x86_64 function %icmp_of_i128(i128, i128) -> b1 { block0(v0: i128, v1: i128): v2 = icmp.i128 of v0, v1 return v2 } ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(-1, -1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 1) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 1) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(1, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x80000000_00000000_00000000_00000000, 0x7FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF) == true ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000000) == false ; run: %icmp_of_i128(0x4FFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF, 0x30000000_00000000_00000000_00000001) == false
There is a more comprehensive testsuite for this in tree at
cranelift/filetests/filetests/runtests/i128-icmp-overflow.clif
.Steps to Reproduce
clif-util test ./the-above.clif
Expected Results
The tests to pass.
Actual Results
Running `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` skipped .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: host can't run Aarch64(Aarch64) programs FAIL .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif: run Caused by: Failed test: run: %icmp_of_i128(-170141183460469231731687303715884105728, 1) == true, actual: false 1 tests Error: 1 failure error: process didn't exit successfully: `C:\Users\Afonso\CLionProjects\wasmtime\target\debug\clif-util.exe test .\filetests\filetests\runtests\i128-icmp-overflow.clif` (exit code: 1)
Versions and Environment
Cranelift version or commit:
main
Operating system: Windows
Architecture:x86_64
Extra Info
We also do some weird codegen compared to llvm:
Here's what we generate:
push rbp mov rbp, rsp mov r10, r8 cmp rdx, r9 seto al sete r8b mov rdx, r10 cmp rcx, rdx seto r9b and r8, r9 or rax, r8 and rax, 1 mov rsp, rbp pop rbp ret
VS llvm's implementation:
cmp rdi, rdx sbb rsi, rcx seto al ret
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC