Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #4099 wasmtime_wasi: inherit_env leaking...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2022 at 14:50):

YannikSc labeled issue #4099:

Note: I'm not sure if my implementation is correct, so please correct me if my implementation or expectations are wrong.

Test Case

Example project is available here

Steps to Reproduce

Expected Results

It might be a user issue, as I'm not sure if my implementation is correct, but I would assume, that it is.

So in this case my expectation would be, that the memory at the end is likely the same as the one at the start.

Actual Results

The memory size at the end is (for 2000 function calls in my example) ~10 time bigger than at the beginning

Versions and Environment

Wasmtime & Wasmtime_wasi version: 0.36.0

uname -srm: Linux 5.17.5-zen1-1-zen x86_64

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2022 at 14:50):

YannikSc opened issue #4099:

Note: I'm not sure if my implementation is correct, so please correct me if my implementation or expectations are wrong.

Test Case

Example project is available here

Steps to Reproduce

Expected Results

It might be a user issue, as I'm not sure if my implementation is correct, but I would assume, that it is.

So in this case my expectation would be, that the memory at the end is likely the same as the one at the start.

Actual Results

The memory size at the end is (for 2000 function calls in my example) ~10 time bigger than at the beginning

Versions and Environment

Wasmtime & Wasmtime_wasi version: 0.36.0

uname -srm: Linux 5.17.5-zen1-1-zen x86_64

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2022 at 15:00):

YannikSc edited issue #4099:

Note: I'm not sure if my implementation is correct, so please correct me if my implementation or expectations are wrong.

Test Case

Example project is available here

Steps to Reproduce

Expected Results

It might be a user issue, as I'm not sure if my implementation is correct, but I would assume, that it is.

So in this case my expectation would be, that the memory at the end is likely the same as the one at the start.

Actual Results

The memory size at the end is (for 2000 function calls in my example) ~10 time bigger than at the beginning

Versions and Environment

Wasmtime & Wasmtime_wasi version: 0.36.0

uname -srm: Linux 5.17.5-zen1-1-zen x86_64

edit: This also happens if the env method is used


Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC