github-actions[bot] commented on issue #3993:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @cfallin, @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:area:aarch64", "cranelift:area:machinst", "cranelift:area:x64", "isle"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- cfallin: isle
- fitzgen: isle
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
abrown commented on issue #3993:
@cfallin: any thoughts on the current test failures? They are all spec tests that should trap but now don't. I'm planning to compare codegen for these tests before and after the changes but I was wondering if this sounded familiar to you before I do that.
cfallin commented on issue #3993:
Hmm, it's possible that the wraparound/overflow semantics with offsets changing could cause some spec tests to fail -- I think reducing to the assertion(s) that fail then comparing codegen is a good approach...
abrown commented on issue #3993:
it's possible that the wraparound/overflow semantics with offsets changing could cause some spec tests to fail
Yeah, I just needed to be more careful there; the original code is checking multiple things about the offset.
abrown commented on issue #3993:
I ran
cargo +nightly fuzz run differential_spec
for this long:=== Execution rate (238915 executed modules / 575000 tried modules): 41.5504347826087% ===
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 13:07 UTC