fitzgen opened issue #3779:
Seems like an oversight on our part.
I'm imagining that we would
- Make the default amount of fuel
0in the CLI- Add a
--add-fuel <N>option to addNfuel to the storeI think (1) miiiiight be slightly controversial? As an alternative, we would have a
--set-fuel <N>option, instead of--add-fuel <N>, and then we would have to ensure that the store gets exactlyNfuel rather than addingNadditional fuel to it. This is a little bit of a divergence from theConfigmethods, so I prefer the former, but I'm open either way.
In any case, this should be a pretty easy thing to implement for anyone looking to dive into the Wasmtime code base for the first time. The changes would need to be made around here:
See https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing.html for contributing details.
fitzgen labeled issue #3779:
Seems like an oversight on our part.
I'm imagining that we would
- Make the default amount of fuel
0in the CLI- Add a
--add-fuel <N>option to addNfuel to the storeI think (1) miiiiight be slightly controversial? As an alternative, we would have a
--set-fuel <N>option, instead of--add-fuel <N>, and then we would have to ensure that the store gets exactlyNfuel rather than addingNadditional fuel to it. This is a little bit of a divergence from theConfigmethods, so I prefer the former, but I'm open either way.
In any case, this should be a pretty easy thing to implement for anyone looking to dive into the Wasmtime code base for the first time. The changes would need to be made around here:
See https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing.html for contributing details.
ilikepi63 commented on issue #3779:
sdeleuze commented on issue #3779:
Hi, should this issue be closed since #3792 has been merged via 85cf4b042a67706669a1f1edea582d885b787a93?
fitzgen commented on issue #3779:
Yes, thanks.
fitzgen closed issue #3779:
Seems like an oversight on our part.
I'm imagining that we would
- Make the default amount of fuel
0in the CLI- Add a
--add-fuel <N>option to addNfuel to the storeI think (1) miiiiight be slightly controversial? As an alternative, we would have a
--set-fuel <N>option, instead of--add-fuel <N>, and then we would have to ensure that the store gets exactlyNfuel rather than addingNadditional fuel to it. This is a little bit of a divergence from theConfigmethods, so I prefer the former, but I'm open either way.
In any case, this should be a pretty easy thing to implement for anyone looking to dive into the Wasmtime code base for the first time. The changes would need to be made around here:
See https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing.html for contributing details.
Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC