github-actions[bot] commented on issue #3355:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @kubkon, @peterhuene
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "wasi", "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:c-api"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- kubkon: wasi
- peterhuene: wasmtime:api, wasmtime:c-api
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
akirilov-arm commented on issue #3355:
@sunfishcode Interesting, in order to fix issue #3310 on AArch64 Linux, we will need to call the
membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE, 0)
, and I suppose that would have to go throughrsix
as well - is it implemented in the crate and if not, are there plans to? Currently, the idea is to wait for support inlibc
, but doing it inrsix
might be a faster route.
akirilov-arm edited a comment on issue #3355:
@sunfishcode Interesting, in order to fix issue #3310 on AArch64 Linux, we need to do the
membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE, 0)
system call, and I suppose that would have to go throughrsix
as well - is it implemented in the crate and if not, are there plans to? Currently the idea is to wait for support inlibc
, but doing it inrsix
might be a faster route.
bjorn3 commented on issue #3355:
Adding it to rsix would require first adding it to libc I think as rsix falls back to libc when
--cfg rsix_use_libc
is used.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC