Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #3030 Implement relocation tests in cran...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 24 2021 at 19:01):

afonso360 opened issue #3030:

Feature

Currently we do not perform any tests on the relocations that the backends emit. While implementing #3026 I struggled with getting the correct output partially because I did not have a good way to check what was being emitted.

Benefit

Testing relocations is obviously desirable to prevent regressions and to ensure we get the correct output.

Implementation

@cfallin has suggested two approaches:

Alternatives

We can keep going as is, but it would be nice if we could test this

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 04 2021 at 11:51):

akirilov-arm labeled issue #3030:

Feature

Currently we do not perform any tests on the relocations that the backends emit. While implementing #3026 I struggled with getting the correct output partially because I did not have a good way to check what was being emitted.

Benefit

Testing relocations is obviously desirable to prevent regressions and to ensure we get the correct output.

Implementation

@cfallin has suggested two approaches:

Alternatives

We can keep going as is, but it would be nice if we could test this

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 09 2022 at 21:54):

jameysharp closed issue #3030:

Feature

Currently we do not perform any tests on the relocations that the backends emit. While implementing #3026 I struggled with getting the correct output partially because I did not have a good way to check what was being emitted.

Benefit

Testing relocations is obviously desirable to prevent regressions and to ensure we get the correct output.

Implementation

@cfallin has suggested two approaches:

Alternatives

We can keep going as is, but it would be nice if we could test this


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC