cfallin edited issue #2907:
Cranelift emits AbsoluteRelocation
Reloc::Abs8
whenis_pic
setting is enabled in architectureaarch64
Steps to Reproduce
(module ;; Recursive factorial (func (export "fac-rec") (param i64) (result i64) (if (result i64) (i64.eq (local.get 0) (i64.const 0)) (then (i64.const 1)) (else (i64.mul (local.get 0) (call 0 (i64.sub (local.get 0) (i64.const 1)))) ) ) ) )
$ wasmtime wasm2obj fac.wat fac.o
Code emitted
fac.o
has absolute relocations.Expected Results
Is expected for Cranelift to emit a relative relocation for aarch64 when
is_pic
is enabled.Actual Results
Code emitted with an absolute relocation.
Versions and Environment
Cranelift version:
cranelift-codegen = "0.73.0"
Operating system: Any
Architecture: Aarch64Extra info
Here's where the wrong code is emitted:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/207da989acf5c6d828dd5d1704c05c0d01b1dead/cranelift/codegen/src/isa/aarch64/inst/emit.rs#L2440-L2462In the new x86 backend however, the
is_pic
case is properly handled:
syrusakbary commented on issue #2907:
I'd love to create a PR, but I will need a bit of guidance since I'm not very familiar with the new backend architecture.
I think asserting the non-PIC settings upon creation is a good idea. Could you point which file is responsible for that logic?Thanks!
syrusakbary edited a comment on issue #2907:
I'd love to create a PR, but I will need a bit of guidance since I'm not very familiar with the new backend architecture.
I think asserting the non-PIC settings upon creation is a good idea. Could you point what (module/file) should be responsible to handle that logic?Thanks!
bnjbvr commented on issue #2907:
I don't have any plans to work on this as part of the M1 focus, so anyone feel free to take this!
akirilov-arm commented on issue #2907:
Issue #1657 seems to be related to this.
akirilov-arm labeled issue #2907:
Cranelift emits AbsoluteRelocation
Reloc::Abs8
whenis_pic
setting is enabled in architectureaarch64
Steps to Reproduce
(module ;; Recursive factorial (func (export "fac-rec") (param i64) (result i64) (if (result i64) (i64.eq (local.get 0) (i64.const 0)) (then (i64.const 1)) (else (i64.mul (local.get 0) (call 0 (i64.sub (local.get 0) (i64.const 1)))) ) ) ) )
$ wasmtime wasm2obj fac.wat fac.o
Code emitted
fac.o
has absolute relocations.Expected Results
Is expected for Cranelift to emit a relative relocation for aarch64 when
is_pic
is enabled.Actual Results
Code emitted with an absolute relocation.
Versions and Environment
Cranelift version:
cranelift-codegen = "0.73.0"
Operating system: Any
Architecture: Aarch64Extra info
Here's where the wrong code is emitted:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/207da989acf5c6d828dd5d1704c05c0d01b1dead/cranelift/codegen/src/isa/aarch64/inst/emit.rs#L2440-L2462In the new x86 backend however, the
is_pic
case is properly handled:
cfallin commented on issue #2907:
@syrusakbary a top-level check/assert in
aarch64/mod.rs
where theAArch64Backend
is created (innew_with_flags
) would be a good short-term bandaid to fail more cleanly.The actual GOT-reference implementation is probably not too bad either -- the main thing is to match the relocations and instructions that the linker expects, which one could get by building e.g. some C code and looking at the resulting .o.
syrusakbary commented on issue #2907:
@cfallin thanks for the insights, I just did a quick check on the code.
Would you be open on refactoringnew_with_flags
so it returns aResult
? (probably this change will also spill on other structs)The main reason for that is that setting up a Backend would never cause an abort/exit, even if it's provided with a flag that exists, but is not supported in a specific backend (in that case it will return an
Err
).
cfallin commented on issue #2907:
Sure, that sounds reasonable -- it's plausible there may be other "unsupported configuration errors" in the future. This would propagate a
Result
out to the ISA builder API, I guess, and then we can fail on that in the toplevel CLI.
bjorn3 commented on issue #2907:
Someone on the zulip got hit by this. Android requires position independent code and the dynamic linker refuses to run any executables with relocations in the
.text
section.
jameysharp closed issue #2907:
Cranelift emits AbsoluteRelocation
Reloc::Abs8
whenis_pic
setting is enabled in architectureaarch64
Steps to Reproduce
(module ;; Recursive factorial (func (export "fac-rec") (param i64) (result i64) (if (result i64) (i64.eq (local.get 0) (i64.const 0)) (then (i64.const 1)) (else (i64.mul (local.get 0) (call 0 (i64.sub (local.get 0) (i64.const 1)))) ) ) ) )
$ wasmtime wasm2obj fac.wat fac.o
Code emitted
fac.o
has absolute relocations.Expected Results
Is expected for Cranelift to emit a relative relocation for aarch64 when
is_pic
is enabled.Actual Results
Code emitted with an absolute relocation.
Versions and Environment
Cranelift version:
cranelift-codegen = "0.73.0"
Operating system: Any
Architecture: Aarch64Extra info
Here's where the wrong code is emitted:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/207da989acf5c6d828dd5d1704c05c0d01b1dead/cranelift/codegen/src/isa/aarch64/inst/emit.rs#L2440-L2462In the new x86 backend however, the
is_pic
case is properly handled:
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC