Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #2056 Let `WasmTy` differentiate between...

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2022 at 16:51):

alexcrichton labeled issue #2056:

Only matters for reference types. But if we know the call is borrowing a reference type that will outlive the call, we don't need to add it into the activations table because the borrow checker already ensures it will live long enough.

Currently only Func::{wrap,get} will pass by value (and therefore need the activations table) while Func::call will pass borrows (and therefore we know the reference will outlive the call, and it doesn't need to go into the table).

See also https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime-dotnet/issues/27#issuecomment-662002571

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2022 at 16:52):

github-actions[bot] commented on issue #2056:

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @peterhuene

<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:api"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.

Learn more.
</details>

Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 13:07 UTC