fitzgen opened issue #15080:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/15051#discussion_r4413744525
FWIW I think that the concurrent code is going to need some relatively invasive changes to handle the GC ABI. Not only because of rooting everywhere but also because limits/maximums in params/results are pretty heavily baked in to the implementation on the host side. It might be best to just reject this for now and have a separate
todo!or component-model-async integration being a big TODO item.For example there's code like this which is definitely not correct for GC.
fitzgen added the wasm-proposal:component-model label to Issue #15080.
fitzgen added the wasm-proposal:gc label to Issue #15080.
Last updated: Oct 31 2026 at 23:03 UTC