Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #10929 Cranelift: unimplemented >64 bits...

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 12:26):

akldc opened issue #10929:

.clif Test Case

test optimize
set opt_level=none
set preserve_frame_pointers=true
set enable_multi_ret_implicit_sret=true

function %main() -> i32x4 fast {
    ss0 = explicit_slot 32
    ss1 = explicit_slot 32
    const0 = 0x40ad3fb47cb16076c8cb1fdd8189d40f

block0():
    v1 = vconst.i32x4 const0
    v2 = bxor_not v1, v1
    v3 = icmp.i32x4 ne v1, v2
    return v3
}

; print: %main()

Result

When opt_level is set to none, it runs correctly.

[x86    ] %main() -> 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[aarch64] %main() -> 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Then set opt_level to speed.

[x86    ] thread 'main' panicked at cranelift/codegen/src/opts.rs:189:5:
unimplemented for > 64 bits
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
return code: 101

[aarch64] thread 'main' panicked at cranelift/codegen/src/opts.rs:189:5:
unimplemented for > 64 bits
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
return code: 101

The issue likely occurs during optimization of bxor and icmp instructions.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 12:26):

akldc added the bug label to Issue #10929.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 12:26):

akldc added the cranelift label to Issue #10929.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2025 at 01:09):

alexcrichton commented on issue #10929:

Thanks for the report! Should be fixed in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/10948

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2025 at 07:56):

akldc commented on issue #10929:

@alexcrichton Great, I’ll close this issue.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2025 at 07:56):

akldc closed issue #10929:

.clif Test Case

test optimize
set opt_level=none
set preserve_frame_pointers=true
set enable_multi_ret_implicit_sret=true

function %main() -> i32x4 fast {
    ss0 = explicit_slot 32
    ss1 = explicit_slot 32
    const0 = 0x40ad3fb47cb16076c8cb1fdd8189d40f

block0():
    v1 = vconst.i32x4 const0
    v2 = bxor_not v1, v1
    v3 = icmp.i32x4 ne v1, v2
    return v3
}

; print: %main()

Result

When opt_level is set to none, it runs correctly.

[x86    ] %main() -> 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[aarch64] %main() -> 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Then set opt_level to speed.

[x86    ] thread 'main' panicked at cranelift/codegen/src/opts.rs:189:5:
unimplemented for > 64 bits
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
return code: 101

[aarch64] thread 'main' panicked at cranelift/codegen/src/opts.rs:189:5:
unimplemented for > 64 bits
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
return code: 101

The issue likely occurs during optimization of bxor and icmp instructions.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2025 at 14:29):

alexcrichton commented on issue #10929:

Oh for the future we typically leave issues open until the PR fixing them has been merged (and the issue typically gets closed automatically during the merge). No worries though on this one but figured I'd give you a heads up.

Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 07:03 UTC