Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 06 2023 at 23:39): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 06 2023 at 23:39):fitzgen edited issue #1065:
To write a functional language compiler using this IR, tail call eliminations would be desirable. Are there any plans to support this? I couldn't find any details in the docs.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 25 2023 at 21:10):fitzgen commented on issue #1065:
FYI, Wasmtime is gaining a
Config::wasm_tail_callmethod and--features tail-callCLI flag in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/6774 and (unless you're on s390x) once that lands you can start running.wasms with tail calls on Wasmtime!As a reminder, tail calls won't be enabled by default until we
- [ ] resolve the
tailcalling convention performance regression (https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/6759)- [ ] get s390x support for tail calls (https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/6530)
- [ ] and meet all the other usual standards for enabling a Wasm feature by default: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-implementing-wasm-proposals.html#enabling-support-for-a-proposal-by-default
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 10 2024 at 02:16):alexcrichton closed issue #1065:
To write a functional language compiler using this IR, tail call eliminations would be desirable. Are there any plans to support this? I couldn't find any details in the docs.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 10 2024 at 02:16):alexcrichton commented on issue #1065:
Tail calls are now enabled by default in Wasmtime except for s390x, so I think this is done.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC