bjorn3 commented on issue #1061:
Heap_addr is gone now. Is this still something we want to persue?
bjorn3 edited a comment on issue #1061:
Heap_addr is gone now. Is this still something we want to pursue?
cfallin commented on issue #1061:
We've moved in the opposite direction, making CLIF lower-level and lifting the heap-sandboxing abstractions into
cranelift-wasm
. I think I'll go ahead and close this as there does not really seem to be a concrete use-case on the table (and a robust sandbox built from CLIF would need significant thought on many other aspects too, which Wasm has already done). That doesn't mean we'd never consider this in the future but I don't think it's really necessary to keep an open issue for it, IMHO.
cfallin closed issue #1061:
What if we added
heap_load
andheap_store
instructions, which would roughly be legalized intoheap_addr
+load
andheap_addr
+store
. That way, frontends could produce Cranelift IR without themselves dealing with plainload
andstore
, which would eliminate the possibility of misusing them and facing undefined behavior.The next step would be to add a wasm-like indirect call instruction, possibly named
table_call
. This would be more complex because we don't yet have a builtin way to legalize this that includes signature checking, but it's doable.Then, it's plausible to imagine defining an IR subset which is completely safe, yet still reasonably complete. We could then clearly document unsafe constructs like
load
andstore
as such, possibly with an optional verifier pass that could enforce that no unsafe constructs are present, and make it easy for people to generate IR without having to worry about undefined behavior.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC