Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / issue #10051 Wasmtime serve does not maintain ...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 20 2025 at 17:19):

mschuwalow opened issue #10051:

Feature

Not sure whether this is intended behaviour, but currently wasmtime serve does not maintain state of the component between different requests (I guess because a new store gets created for each invocation here)

As a user, I would expect it to maintain state between different requests.

Benefit

The proposed behaviour should be more in-line with user expecations. If the current behavior is documented / intended, feel free to close this issue.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 20 2025 at 19:59):

bjorn3 commented on issue #10051:

This is intended. Each request gets served by a separate instance for better security by isolating requests from each other.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 20 2025 at 20:00):

mschuwalow closed issue #10051:

Feature

Not sure whether this is intended behaviour, but currently wasmtime serve does not maintain state of the component between different requests (I guess because a new store gets created for each invocation here)

As a user, I would expect it to maintain state between different requests.

Benefit

The proposed behaviour should be more in-line with user expecations. If the current behavior is documented / intended, feel free to close this issue.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 20 2025 at 20:00):

mschuwalow commented on issue #10051:

that's fair. Closing this issue


Last updated: Jan 24 2025 at 00:11 UTC