alexcrichton opened PR #9966 from alexcrichton:pulley-fuzz
to bytecodealliance:main
:
This commit refactors the
wasmtime-fuzzing
crate to enable fuzzing the Pulley interpreter and the Winch compiler more often. Winch has been feature-complete for much of wasm for a good amount of time now and Pulley now supports many wasm proposals as well. Both strategies have wasm proposals that are still disabled, however.I've run fuzzers for a bit locally and haven't turned up too too much, but I'm sure OSS-Fuzz will chastise me and tell me all the places I'm forgetting to add various configs and tweaks.
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #9966.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #9966.
alexcrichton updated PR #9966.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9966:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
abrown submitted PR review.
alexcrichton merged PR #9966.
Last updated: Jan 24 2025 at 00:11 UTC