alexcrichton opened PR #9885 from alexcrichton:aarch64-musl-build
to bytecodealliance:main
:
This commit refactors the way release builds are done in CI in terms of configuration and then additionally adds aarch64-musl release artifacts as requested in #9875. The refactoring here is done to reduce the number of locations to understand release builds. Notably the
binary-compatible-builds
action was removed in favor of direct environment configuration in conjunction with docker images used to build. Theaarch64-musl
build itself happens in a container provided by thecross
project to ensure that the right toolchain is configured.Closes #9875
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton updated PR #9885.
alexcrichton commented on PR #9885:
@whitequark from this CI page if you scroll to the bottom and find
bins-aarch64-musl
(here's a direct link, not sure if that'll work) can you test that out? Mostly just make sure./wasmtime --help
does something and maybe poke at the commands a bit. If that works I think this is probably good to go to eventually get integrated into wasmtime-py
whitequark commented on PR #9885:
OK so here is what I get if I run wasmtime in alpine edge on aarch64:
![Screenshot_20241220_210142](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11dc3b19-dd29-4e4c-a4ff-9caf1d7f3fd5)
whitequark commented on PR #9885:
I think this might be Alpine-specific, for some reason libgcc isn't installed by default? Anyway, after I fixed that, it ran and executed a real Wasm application (nextpnr).
alexcrichton commented on PR #9885:
Ok perfect, thanks! I still don't know how to best manage libgcc_s on musl but it's at least no worse-off than the x64 target which I believe has the same behavior.
alexcrichton has marked PR #9885 as ready for review.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #9885.
alexcrichton requested dicej for a review on PR #9885.
dicej submitted PR review.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC