alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #9546.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9546.
alexcrichton opened PR #9546 from alexcrichton:minor-ergonomic-things
to bytecodealliance:main
:
- Change
Config::allocation_strategy
to takeimpl Into<...>
to avoid importingInstanceAllocationStrategy
.- Add
PoolingAllocationConfig::new
as an alias for::default
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton updated PR #9546.
alexcrichton updated PR #9546.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #9546.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9546:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config
][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstruct
s).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
abrown submitted PR review.
abrown created PR review comment:
PoolingAllocationConfig::default()
abrown created PR review comment:
Not sure I get why this must now be non-exhaustive?
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
Ah this should have been non_exhaustive before because one variant is conditionally defined, so I figured I'd go ahead and fix it while I was here
alexcrichton updated PR #9546.
alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #9546.
alexcrichton merged PR #9546.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC