beetrees opened PR #9459 from beetrees:atomic-128-x64
to bytecodealliance:main
:
Rust is currently in the process of stabilising 128-bit atomics (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99069#issuecomment-2142718778), but Cranelift (and therefore
rustc_codegen_cranelift
) doesn't currently support 128-bit atomics.This PR adds IR support for 128-bit atomics and implements lowering them for the x64 backend using
cmpxchg16b
.
beetrees requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #9459.
beetrees requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #9459.
beetrees requested fitzgen for a review on PR #9459.
beetrees requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #9459.
beetrees requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9459.
beetrees updated PR #9459.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9459:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @cfallin, @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:area:x64", "cranelift:meta", "fuzzing", "isle", "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:config"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- cfallin: isle
- fitzgen: fuzzing, isle
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9459:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config
][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstruct
s).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
fitzgen submitted PR review:
Very nice, thanks!
fitzgen created PR review comment:
// This will clobber `temp_high`
fitzgen updated PR #9459.
fitzgen has enabled auto merge for PR #9459.
beetrees commented on PR #9459:
I think CI might be stuck? Test macOS x86_64 (wasmtime-cli) seems to have been stuck on
cargo fetch --locked
for over an hour.
beetrees commented on PR #9459:
Never mind, its managed to move on to the next step.
beetrees edited a comment on PR #9459:
Never mind, it's managed to move on to the next step.
beetrees commented on PR #9459:
It seems to have got stuck in the
./ci/run-tests.sh
step now (first it was stuck at the very start of the step for around 30 mins, and now it's stuck atCompiling bytesize v1.3.0
).
fitzgen commented on PR #9459:
I've been seeing a lot of network issues in github actions the last week or so
fitzgen merged PR #9459.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC