alexcrichton opened PR #9452 from alexcrichton:test-that-fuzzers-work
to bytecodealliance:main
:
This commit adds a test to the
wasmtime-fuzzing
crate as a sanity-check that eventually a module is generated requiring all of the features that wasmtime supports. This is intended to be another double-check in the process of enabling a proposal in Wasmtime by ensuring that the feature is added to this list which then transitively requires that fuzzing eventually generates a module needing that feature.cc #9449
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #9452.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #9452.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #9452.
alexcrichton commented on PR #9452:
One thing I hope this can help guarantee is that if a feature is not listed in the list here then we're basically guaranteed we're not fuzzing it in the general-purpose fuzzers. That's a quick-and-easy check of "when stabilizing make sure the feature is in this list" because if not it doesn't check the fuzzing checkbox.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9452:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing", "wasmtime:docs"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
fitzgen submitted PR review:
Nice! Low effort but (hopefully) big long-term payoff.
alexcrichton merged PR #9452.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC