Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #9447 Add missing pooling allocator options...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 17:28):

omarjatoi requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9447.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 17:28):

omarjatoi requested fitzgen for a review on PR #9447.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 17:28):

omarjatoi opened PR #9447 from omarjatoi:9256-pooling-allocator-flags to bytecodealliance:main:

From #9256, this PR adds the missing pooling allocator configuration options as CLI flags. I also renamed some minor things for consistency.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 17:31):

omarjatoi edited PR #9447:

From #9256, this PR adds the missing pooling allocator configuration options as CLI flags. I also renamed some minor things for consistency.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 17:37):

omarjatoi submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 17:37):

omarjatoi created PR review comment:

This option was added to the struct but never used below: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/crates/wasmtime/src/config.rs#L2585-L2588

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 17:41):

omarjatoi edited PR review comment.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:02):

fitzgen created PR review comment:

Beyond the weird indentation, I think this is just a duplicate copy of what the existing if let Some(limit) is doing, but nested inside the existing copy?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:02):

fitzgen created PR review comment:

This one doesn't mention the default value, but it should to be consistent with the other config knobs.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:02):

fitzgen submitted PR review:

Thanks! Just a couple comments below

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:02):

fitzgen created PR review comment:

Ah, I see that earlier issue is fixed in this later commit.

In the future, can you either keep separate commits clean and individually reviewable or squash them into a single commit so that we don't have confusing situations like this? Thanks!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:04):

omarjatoi submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:04):

omarjatoi created PR review comment:

Yeah, I messed up my commits :sweat_smile: I'll fix them in the PR shortly

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:08):

fitzgen submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:08):

fitzgen created PR review comment:

At this point its fine, no worries, just something to think about for the future :)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:21):

omarjatoi updated PR #9447.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:23):

omarjatoi updated PR #9447.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:26):

omarjatoi commented on PR #9447:

Thanks for the comments! I've added defaults in comments and cleaned up the commits.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:33):

fitzgen submitted PR review:

Thanks!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:33):

fitzgen has enabled auto merge for PR #9447.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 10 2024 at 19:50):

fitzgen merged PR #9447.


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC