Tirthnp opened PR #9314 from Tirthnp:Change_ConstEvalContext
to bytecodealliance:main
:
Remove module field from wasmtime::runtime::vm::const_expr::ConstEval…
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
Tirthnp edited PR #9314:
Remove module field from wasmtime::runtime::vm::const_expr::ConstEvalContext
issue #9311
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
Tirthnp edited PR #9314:
Remove module field from wasmtime::runtime::vm::const_expr::ConstEvalContext
issue #9311
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
fitzgen submitted PR review:
Thanks a bunch!
fitzgen commented on PR #9314:
Looks like this needs a
cargo fmt
before CI will pass
Tirthnp updated PR #9314.
Tirthnp has marked PR #9314 as ready for review.
Tirthnp requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #9314.
Tirthnp requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9314.
alexcrichton merged PR #9314.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC