fitzgen opened PR #9301 from fitzgen:array-oob-trap-code
to bytecodealliance:main
:
This is needed in the implementation of Wasm GC's array instructions.
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
fitzgen requested abrown for a review on PR #9301.
fitzgen requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #9301.
fitzgen requested elliottt for a review on PR #9301.
fitzgen requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9301.
alexcrichton submitted PR review:
Musing about this, we may actually want to one day not have the exact list of traps in Cranelift match the exact list of traps in Wasmtime. We might want to define Cranelift trap codes are "simply a u8" which might be much more flexible for Wasmtime as well since we wouldn't have to mirror everything in two locations. No need to do that now though, just a future possibility.
fitzgen commented on PR #9301:
We'd have to figure out what to do about how they are packed into
MemFlags
. Might be worth taking flags out into a secondary map or something.
alexcrichton commented on PR #9301:
Oh
MemFlags
should be able to easily fit 8 bits. Custom user traps in Cranelift right now though are 16 bits and that we can't fit the whole width intoMemFlags
fitzgen merged PR #9301.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC