vulc41n requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #9252.
vulc41n requested elliottt for a review on PR #9252.
vulc41n requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9252.
vulc41n opened PR #9252 from vulc41n:winch-aarch64-dyn-heap
to bytecodealliance:main
:
Hey :wave:
This PR implements everything needed to run winch for aarch64 with dynamic heap. It implements the following macro instructions :
trap
,trapif
,cmov
andchecked_add
.<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9252:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @saulecabrera
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "winch"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- saulecabrera: winch
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
saulecabrera submitted PR review:
Thanks. Left some comments which we should address/clarify.
saulecabrera created PR review comment:
I believe here we'd want to use
Cond::Hs
? TheCond::Vs
is for signed overflow. (Ref: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0801/l/Condition-Codes/Carry-flag)
saulecabrera created PR review comment:
I think it'd be better to handle this instruction via
csel
. Any particular reason you decided to go this route?
vulc41n submitted PR review.
vulc41n created PR review comment:
You're right, I didn't think about it
vulc41n updated PR #9252.
saulecabrera submitted PR review:
LGTM, thanks!
saulecabrera commented on PR #9252:
@vulc41n it looks like an update to the filetests is needed?
saulecabrera updated PR #9252.
saulecabrera commented on PR #9252:
@vulc41n filetests were correct, it needed a rebase. I took the liberty to do the rebase so that we can go ahead and land this PR.
saulecabrera merged PR #9252.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC