fitzgen opened PR #9164 from fitzgen:no-more-ref-types
to bytecodealliance:main
:
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
fitzgen requested abrown for a review on PR #9164.
fitzgen requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #9164.
fitzgen requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9164.
fitzgen requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #9164.
fitzgen updated PR #9164.
cfallin submitted PR review:
(Cranelift) reftypes are dead; long life (Wasm) reftypes!
Really happy to see this simplification -- long time coming, thanks for all the work pushing it through.
cfallin created PR review comment:
It looks like this whole test was deleted because it uses a
null.r64
instruction, but the instruction isn't critical to the test (result of random fuzz generation); could we replace it with aniconst.i64 0
or somesuch and keep the test?
cfallin submitted PR review:
(Cranelift) reftypes are dead; long live (Wasm) reftypes!
Really happy to see this simplification -- long time coming, thanks for all the work pushing it through.
fitzgen updated PR #9164.
fitzgen submitted PR review.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Ah, I didn't look closely and assumed it relied on the
r64
; added it back and updated it!
fitzgen has enabled auto merge for PR #9164.
fitzgen merged PR #9164.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC