vulc41n opened PR #9092 from vulc41n:winch-aarch64-memory
to bytecodealliance:main
:
Hey :wave:
This PR implements
wasm_load
,wasm_store
andload_ptr
instructions for winch targeting aarch64.#8321
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
vulc41n requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #9092.
vulc41n requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9092.
vulc41n requested fitzgen for a review on PR #9092.
fitzgen requested saulecabrera for a review on PR #9092.
fitzgen commented on PR #9092:
Redirecting review to @saulecabrera
saulecabrera submitted PR review:
Looking good. Left one minor comment before landing this one.
saulecabrera submitted PR review:
Looking good. Left one minor comment before landing this one.
saulecabrera created PR review comment:
Could
ldr
instead of accepting a boolean acceptOption<ExtKind>
? Or instead -- and maybe this is what I'd prefer -- we could introduce two methods at the assembler level:
sload
uload
And we could dispatch from
wasm_load
to the corresponding method depending on the value ofkind
, this would make more explicit depending on the extension kind. Additionally this would make it less error prone than passing a boolean.
vulc41n updated PR #9092.
saulecabrera submitted PR review.
saulecabrera merged PR #9092.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC