Kmeakin requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #9040.
Kmeakin opened PR #9040 from Kmeakin:km/loose-inequalities-to-strict-inequalities-v2
to bytecodealliance:main
:
A 2nd attempt at https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/6130. This time with a regression test
Kmeakin requested elliottt for a review on PR #9040.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9040:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @cfallin, @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "isle"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- cfallin: isle
- fitzgen: isle
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
Kmeakin requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #9040.
Kmeakin updated PR #9040.
elliottt submitted PR review.
elliottt created PR review comment:
Is the main difference to #6130 this commented out rule?
Kmeakin submitted PR review.
Kmeakin created PR review comment:
Yes
Kmeakin updated PR #9040.
Kmeakin updated PR #9040.
Kmeakin updated PR #9040.
elliottt submitted PR review.
elliottt created PR review comment:
Would you mind adding a comment explaining why this is currently commented out? With that added, I think this should be good to merge :+1:
Kmeakin submitted PR review.
Kmeakin created PR review comment:
I believe it has been fixed by https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/commit/0683b84b40207d8ec0c9044ef418fbd1f23a62f9
elliottt submitted PR review.
elliottt created PR review comment:
Should it be un-commented now?
Kmeakin submitted PR review.
Kmeakin created PR review comment:
I was wrong. I thought it had been fixed, but that was just because I forgot to uncomment it
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 13:07 UTC