alexcrichton opened PR #8882 from alexcrichton:update-wasm-tools
to bytecodealliance:main
:
This notably brings in a limitation where component model flags types must have 32 or fewer flags in accordance with the transition plan of https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/issues/370. A feature flag is added to go back to the previous behavior to avoid breaking anyone too much.
This additionally brings in a fix for a panic when validating invalid modules with tail calls.
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton commented on PR #8882:
I'll note that this is a draft as I'd like to get in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen/pull/990 and https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen/pull/989 and update wit-bindgen here too
alexcrichton updated PR #8882.
alexcrichton updated PR #8882.
alexcrichton has marked PR #8882 as ready for review.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #8882.
alexcrichton requested pchickey for a review on PR #8882.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #8882.
alexcrichton commented on PR #8882:
Ok should be reading pending CI
alexcrichton updated PR #8882.
alexcrichton commented on PR #8882:
On second thought let's not update wit-bindgen.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8882:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config
][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstruct
s).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
pchickey submitted PR review.
alexcrichton merged PR #8882.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC