dundargoc edited PR #8554.
dundargoc edited PR #8554:
This is extremely useful for cases where the default optimizations just
are not enough.Background: neovim is interested to
add wasmtime support in https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/28415 but
we noticed that including wasmtime, even when not using wasmtime
directly, heavily affects runtime performance. This is not only
reflected in the increased startuptime but affects the runtime
performance overall.Here are the benchmarks for startuptimes for different configurations.
Important to note is that all of runtime is affected, but the
startuptime is a decent proxy to measure runtime performance:No wasm Time (mean ± σ): 50.5 ms ± 1.5 ms [User: 32.8 ms, System: 12.3 ms] Range (min … max): 48.3 ms … 54.4 ms 56 runs Wasm, lto=thin Time (mean ± σ): 104.9 ms ± 3.5 ms [User: 86.5 ms, System: 12.7 ms] Range (min … max): 99.5 ms … 111.1 ms 26 runs Wasm, lto=true Time (mean ± σ): 83.8 ms ± 2.5 ms [User: 65.8 ms, System: 12.1 ms] Range (min … max): 80.5 ms … 93.3 ms 31 runs Wasm, lto=true, strip="none", incremental=false, codegen-units=1, panic="abort" Time (mean ± σ): 53.1 ms ± 1.0 ms [User: 35.5 ms, System: 12.5 ms] Range (min … max): 50.6 ms … 55.5 ms 54 runs
dundargoc commented on PR #8554:
Changed proflie name to
fastest-runtime
.
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton merged PR #8554.
dundargoc deleted a comment on PR #8554:
Changed proflie name to
fastest-runtime
.
alexcrichton commented on PR #8554:
I did a bit of debugging and unfortunately I can't figure out what's going on. The slowdown seems related to symbols but also not related to symbols. I suspect there's bits-and-pieces of the mach-o format that I don't understand which are coming into play here. I couldn't reproduce this slowdown on Linux, only on macOS, and profiling there I find a bit more difficult through instruments rather than
perf
. Alas!
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC