tertsdiepraam opened PR #8548 from tertsdiepraam:cranelift-frontend-links
to bytecodealliance:main
:
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->While reading through the documentation for
cranelift-frontend
, I noticed that there were some things that could be converted into links. There were also some links that were spelled out, such asstruct.FunctionBuilderContext.html
, which is unnecessary and confuses rust-analyzer.I've tried to fix up all the easy cases that I could find within this crate. Let me know if you want me to split this up over multiple commits or something like that.
tertsdiepraam requested abrown for a review on PR #8548.
tertsdiepraam requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #8548.
bjorn3 created PR review comment:
Function
derefs toFunctionStencil
, so the extra.stencil
is not necessary.
bjorn3 submitted PR review.
tertsdiepraam submitted PR review.
tertsdiepraam created PR review comment:
Alright, I'll remove it!
tertsdiepraam updated PR #8548.
Looks good to me! Thanks for the changes. Can you amend your commit and add the following somewhere in the doc message so we can trigger the doc build?
protest:full
That way we can see if there's any dead link warnings or the like.
abrown edited a comment on PR #8548:
Looks good to me! Thanks for the changes. Can you amend your commit and add the following somewhere in the doc message so we can trigger the doc build?
prtest:full
That way we can see if there's any dead link warnings or the like.
tertsdiepraam updated PR #8548.
jameysharp submitted PR review:
I agree with @abrown, this all looks good, and it passed the
prtest:full
CI run so let's merge it. Thank you!
jameysharp merged PR #8548.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC